From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 net-next 00/12] eBPF syscall, verifier, testsuite Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:19:01 +0200 Message-ID: <54100975.6030809@redhat.com> References: <1410325808-3657-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Steven Rostedt , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Chema Gonzalez , Eric Dumazet , Peter Zijlstra , Pablo Neira Ayuso , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1410325808-3657-1-git-send-email-ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 09/10/2014 07:09 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: ... > As requested by Andy and others, here is the man page: > > BPF(2) Linux Programmer's Manual BPF(2) ... > In the future maps can have different types: hash, array, bloom filter, > radix-tree, but currently only hash type is supported: > enum bpf_map_type { > BPF_MAP_TYPE_UNSPEC, > BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, > }; If we mention them here in the man page, users are going to request them, naturally. ;) So I'd just mention what we have, not what we do not yet have. But I'm wondering how much library boiler plate only for BPF we want to add in future, hopefully not most of what's in Corman ... ? ;)