From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toshiaki Makita Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bridge: Add filtering support for default_pvid Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:21:30 +0900 Message-ID: <5415B27A.2000508@gmail.com> References: <1410554691-18467-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com> <1410554691-18467-3-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Vladislav Yasevich , shemminger@vyatta.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Vladislav Yasevich , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1410554691-18467-3-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org (14/09/13 (土) 5:44), Vladislav Yasevich wrote: > Currently when vlan filtering is turned on on the bridge, the bridge > will drop all traffic untill the user configures the filter. This > isn't very nice for ports that don't care about vlans and just > want untagged traffic. > > A concept of a default_pvid was recently introduced. This patch > adds filtering support for default_pvid. Now, ports that don't > care about vlans and don't define there own filter will belong > to the VLAN of the default_pvid and continue to receive untagged > traffic. If user sets pvid, then vid 1 (default_pvid) will become non-pvid but still not be filtered, right? vlan_bitmap of default_pvid shouldn't be cleared on setting pvid? Thanks, Toshiaki Makita