From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tom Herbert" <therbert@google.com>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Hannes Frederic Sowa" <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <dborkman@redhat.com>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
"Tim Shepard" <shep@alum.mit.edu>,
"Avery Pennarun" <apenwarr@google.com>
Subject: Re: Qdisc: Measuring Head-of-Line blocking with netperf-wrapper
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:12:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54173A18.2010705@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7ZNbvwLtcFfwRVVF8asnxwp104g7iR-oZv3nj0mqKbOQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/15/2014 11:55 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Problems with TCP_RR and UDP_RR are that they are subject to a RTO on
> packet loss.
One possible way to work/kludge around that for TCP_RR would be to have
a burst-mode test with say five or so transactions in flight at one
time. That then should allow for fast retrans on the occasional
single-packet loss and it will be just an RTT rather than an RTO. There
would probably be some interactions with cwnd and bundling though upon
that retransmission, even with -D set.
> It would be nice if netperf could sprout a "send a user specified
> packet size on this isochronous interval (with a resolution below a
> ms) over X transport" test. Or there was something simpler than owamp
> but as secure.
If you are willing to let netperf spin (ie burn local CPU on the system
on which netperf is running) over the interval you can configure
--enable-intervals --enable-spin and then it will spin rather than rely
on the resolution of setitimer(). Then the command line would be
something along the lines of:
netperf -H <destination> -b 1 -w <waittime> -- -m <size>
and it will then make one send of <size> every <waittime>.
happy benchmarking,
rick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-15 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-15 16:45 Qdisc: Measuring Head-of-Line blocking with netperf-wrapper Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-15 17:10 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-15 17:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-15 18:55 ` Dave Taht
2014-09-15 19:12 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2014-09-16 6:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-16 15:52 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-16 13:22 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-16 13:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-16 15:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-16 16:08 ` Dave Taht
2014-09-16 16:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-17 7:39 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54173A18.2010705@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=apenwarr@google.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shep@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).