From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/2] net: sched: cls_u32 changes to knode must
 appear atomic to readers
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:06:16 -0700
Message-ID: <541A21F8.3000206@gmail.com>
References: <20140917191131.20529.91136.stgit@nitbit.x32> <20140917191202.20529.87231.stgit@nitbit.x32> <CAHA+R7NWzv8+2aUM1uQX8uZkQv-Dp9fYb0SNwmZqk3gKvXVWtw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]:45488 "EHLO
	mail-ob0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752277AbaIRAGe (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:06:34 -0400
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m8so84976obr.6
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHA+R7NWzv8+2aUM1uQX8uZkQv-Dp9fYb0SNwmZqk3gKvXVWtw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On 09/17/2014 02:11 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John Fastabend
> <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> -static int u32_destroy_key(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_knode *n)
>> +static int u32_destroy_key(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tc_u_knode *n, bool pf)
>>   {
>>          tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &n->res);
>>          tcf_exts_destroy(tp, &n->exts);
>>          if (n->ht_down)
>>                  n->ht_down->refcnt--;
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_CLS_U32_PERF
>> -       free_percpu(n->pf);
>> +       if (pf)
>
> Nit: 'free_pf' is a better name than just 'pf'.
>

agreed I'll update it.

>> +               free_percpu(n->pf);
>>   #endif
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_CLS_U32_MARK
>> -       free_percpu(n->pcpu_success);
>> +       if (pf)
>> +               free_percpu(n->pcpu_success);
>>   #endif
>>          kfree(n);
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static void u32_delete_key_rcu_pf(struct rcu_head *rcu)
>> +{
>> +       struct tc_u_knode *key = container_of(rcu, struct tc_u_knode, rcu);
>> +
>> +       u32_destroy_key(key->tp, key, false);
>> +}
>
> I think you need a comment here to explain why you free it partially
> on purpose, it is not that clear, at least I spent some time to figure
> it out when I read your cls_tcindex patch.
>
> Thanks!
>

Sure how about this,

/* u32_delete_key_rcu_pf should be called when free'ing a copied
  * version of a tc_u_knode obtained from u32_init_knode(). When
  * copies are obtained from u32_init_knode() the statistics are
  * shared between the old and new copies to allow readers to
  * continue to update the statistics during the copy. To support
  * this the u32_delete_key_rcu_pf variant does not free the percpu
  * statistics.
  */


-- 
John Fastabend         Intel Corporation