netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net] net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion
@ 2024-04-15 21:07 Victor Nogueira
  2024-04-18  1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2024-06-07 14:40 ` Johannes Berg
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Victor Nogueira @ 2024-04-15 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: edumazet, davem, kuba, pabeni
  Cc: jhs, jiri, xiyou.wangcong, netdev, renmingshuai, pctammela

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

When the mirred action is used on a classful egress qdisc and a packet is
mirrored or redirected to self we hit a qdisc lock deadlock.
See trace below.

[..... other info removed for brevity....]
[   82.890906]
[   82.890906] ============================================
[   82.890906] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[   82.890906] 6.8.0-05205-g77fadd89fe2d-dirty #213 Tainted: G        W
[   82.890906] --------------------------------------------
[   82.890906] ping/418 is trying to acquire lock:
[   82.890906] ffff888006994110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at:
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1778/0x3550
[   82.890906]
[   82.890906] but task is already holding lock:
[   82.890906] ffff888006994110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at:
__dev_queue_xmit+0x1778/0x3550
[   82.890906]
[   82.890906] other info that might help us debug this:
[   82.890906]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   82.890906]
[   82.890906]        CPU0
[   82.890906]        ----
[   82.890906]   lock(&sch->q.lock);
[   82.890906]   lock(&sch->q.lock);
[   82.890906]
[   82.890906]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   82.890906]
[..... other info removed for brevity....]

Example setup (eth0->eth0) to recreate
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30
tc filter add dev eth0 handle 1: protocol ip prio 2 matchall \
     action mirred egress redirect dev eth0

Another example(eth0->eth1->eth0) to recreate
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30
tc filter add dev eth0 handle 1: protocol ip prio 2 matchall \
     action mirred egress redirect dev eth1

tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30
tc filter add dev eth1 handle 1: protocol ip prio 2 matchall \
     action mirred egress redirect dev eth0

We fix this by adding an owner field (CPU id) to struct Qdisc set after
root qdisc is entered. When the softirq enters it a second time, if the
qdisc owner is the same CPU, the packet is dropped to break the loop.

Reported-by: Mingshuai Ren <renmingshuai@huawei.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240314111713.5979-1-renmingshuai@huawei.com/
Fixes: 3bcb846ca4cf ("net: get rid of spin_trylock() in net_tx_action()")
Fixes: e578d9c02587 ("net: sched: use counter to break reclassify loops")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
Reviewed-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
Tested-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
---
 include/net/sch_generic.h | 1 +
 net/core/dev.c            | 6 ++++++
 net/sched/sch_generic.c   | 1 +
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index 76db6be16083..f561dfb79743 100644
--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct Qdisc {
 	struct qdisc_skb_head	q;
 	struct gnet_stats_basic_sync bstats;
 	struct gnet_stats_queue	qstats;
+	int                     owner;
 	unsigned long		state;
 	unsigned long		state2; /* must be written under qdisc spinlock */
 	struct Qdisc            *next_sched;
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 854a3a28a8d8..f6c6e494f0a9 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3808,6 +3808,10 @@ static inline int __dev_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *q,
 		return rc;
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(q->owner) == smp_processor_id())) {
+		kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_TC_RECLASSIFY_LOOP);
+		return NET_XMIT_DROP;
+	}
 	/*
 	 * Heuristic to force contended enqueues to serialize on a
 	 * separate lock before trying to get qdisc main lock.
@@ -3847,7 +3851,9 @@ static inline int __dev_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *q,
 		qdisc_run_end(q);
 		rc = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
 	} else {
+		WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, smp_processor_id());
 		rc = dev_qdisc_enqueue(skb, q, &to_free, txq);
+		WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, -1);
 		if (qdisc_run_begin(q)) {
 			if (unlikely(contended)) {
 				spin_unlock(&q->busylock);
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index ff5336493777..4a2c763e2d11 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -974,6 +974,7 @@ struct Qdisc *qdisc_alloc(struct netdev_queue *dev_queue,
 	sch->enqueue = ops->enqueue;
 	sch->dequeue = ops->dequeue;
 	sch->dev_queue = dev_queue;
+	sch->owner = -1;
 	netdev_hold(dev, &sch->dev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
 	refcount_set(&sch->refcnt, 1);
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion
  2024-04-15 21:07 [PATCH net] net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion Victor Nogueira
@ 2024-04-18  1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2024-06-07 14:40 ` Johannes Berg
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-04-18  1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Victor Nogueira
  Cc: edumazet, davem, kuba, pabeni, jhs, jiri, xiyou.wangcong, netdev,
	renmingshuai, pctammela

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:07:28 -0300 you wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> 
> When the mirred action is used on a classful egress qdisc and a packet is
> mirrored or redirected to self we hit a qdisc lock deadlock.
> See trace below.
> 
> [..... other info removed for brevity....]
> [   82.890906]
> [   82.890906] ============================================
> [   82.890906] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> [   82.890906] 6.8.0-05205-g77fadd89fe2d-dirty #213 Tainted: G        W
> [   82.890906] --------------------------------------------
> [   82.890906] ping/418 is trying to acquire lock:
> [   82.890906] ffff888006994110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at:
> __dev_queue_xmit+0x1778/0x3550
> [   82.890906]
> [   82.890906] but task is already holding lock:
> [   82.890906] ffff888006994110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at:
> __dev_queue_xmit+0x1778/0x3550
> [   82.890906]
> [   82.890906] other info that might help us debug this:
> [   82.890906]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> [   82.890906]
> [   82.890906]        CPU0
> [   82.890906]        ----
> [   82.890906]   lock(&sch->q.lock);
> [   82.890906]   lock(&sch->q.lock);
> [   82.890906]
> [   82.890906]  *** DEADLOCK ***
> [   82.890906]
> [..... other info removed for brevity....]
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/0f022d32c3ec

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion
  2024-04-15 21:07 [PATCH net] net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion Victor Nogueira
  2024-04-18  1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
@ 2024-06-07 14:40 ` Johannes Berg
  2024-06-07 14:54   ` Eric Dumazet
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2024-06-07 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Victor Nogueira, edumazet, davem, kuba, pabeni
  Cc: jhs, jiri, xiyou.wangcong, netdev, renmingshuai, pctammela

Hi all,

I noticed today that this causes a userspace visible change in behaviour
(and a regression in some of our tests) for transmitting to a device
when it has no carrier, when noop_qdisc is assigned to it. Instead of
silently dropping the packets, -ENOBUFS will be returned if the socket
opted in to RECVERR.

The reason for this is that the static noop_qdisc:

struct Qdisc noop_qdisc = {
        .enqueue        =       noop_enqueue,
        .dequeue        =       noop_dequeue,
        .flags          =       TCQ_F_BUILTIN,
        .ops            =       &noop_qdisc_ops,
        .q.lock         =       __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(noop_qdisc.q.lock),
        .dev_queue      =       &noop_netdev_queue,
        .busylock       =       __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(noop_qdisc.busylock),
        .gso_skb = {
                .next = (struct sk_buff *)&noop_qdisc.gso_skb,
                .prev = (struct sk_buff *)&noop_qdisc.gso_skb,
                .qlen = 0,
                .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(noop_qdisc.gso_skb.lock),
        },
        .skb_bad_txq = {
                .next = (struct sk_buff *)&noop_qdisc.skb_bad_txq,
                .prev = (struct sk_buff *)&noop_qdisc.skb_bad_txq,
                .qlen = 0,
                .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(noop_qdisc.skb_bad_txq.lock),
        },
};

doesn't have an owner set, and it's obviously not allocated via
qdisc_alloc(). Thus, it defaults to 0, so if you get to it on CPU 0 (I
was using ARCH=um which isn't even SMP) then it will just always run
into the 

> +	if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(q->owner) == smp_processor_id())) {
> +		kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_TC_RECLASSIFY_LOOP);
> +		return NET_XMIT_DROP;
> +	}

case.

I'm not sure I understand the busylock logic well enough, so almost
seems to me we shouldn't do this whole thing on the noop_qdisc at all,
e.g. via tagging owner with -2 to say don't do it:

--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3865,9 +3865,11 @@ static inline int __dev_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *q,
 		qdisc_run_end(q);
 		rc = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
 	} else {
-		WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, smp_processor_id());
+		if (q->owner != -2)
+			WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, smp_processor_id());
 		rc = dev_qdisc_enqueue(skb, q, &to_free, txq);
-		WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, -1);
+		if (q->owner != -2)
+			WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, -1);
 		if (qdisc_run_begin(q)) {
 			if (unlikely(contended)) {
 				spin_unlock(&q->busylock);
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index 2a637a17061b..e857e4638671 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -657,6 +657,7 @@ static struct netdev_queue noop_netdev_queue = {
 };
 
 struct Qdisc noop_qdisc = {
+	.owner		=	-2,
 	.enqueue	=	noop_enqueue,
 	.dequeue	=	noop_dequeue,
 	.flags		=	TCQ_F_BUILTIN,


(and yes, I believe it doesn't need to be READ_ONCE for the check
against -2 since that's mutually exclusive with all other values)

Or maybe simply ignoring the value for the noop_qdisc:

--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3822,7 +3822,7 @@ static inline int __dev_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *q,
 		return rc;
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(q->owner) == smp_processor_id())) {
+	if (unlikely(q != &noop_qdisc && READ_ONCE(q->owner) == smp_processor_id())) {
 		kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_TC_RECLASSIFY_LOOP);
 		return NET_XMIT_DROP;
 	}

That's shorter, but I'm not sure if there might be other special
cases...

Or maybe someone can think of an even better fix?

Thanks,
johannes

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion
  2024-06-07 14:40 ` Johannes Berg
@ 2024-06-07 14:54   ` Eric Dumazet
  2024-06-07 14:56     ` Johannes Berg
  2024-06-07 15:53     ` [PATCH] net/sched: initialize noop_qdisc owner Johannes Berg
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2024-06-07 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Berg
  Cc: Victor Nogueira, davem, kuba, pabeni, jhs, jiri, xiyou.wangcong,
	netdev, renmingshuai, pctammela

On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 4:40 PM Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed today that this causes a userspace visible change in behaviour
> (and a regression in some of our tests) for transmitting to a device
> when it has no carrier, when noop_qdisc is assigned to it. Instead of
> silently dropping the packets, -ENOBUFS will be returned if the socket
> opted in to RECVERR.
>
> The reason for this is that the static noop_qdisc:
>
> struct Qdisc noop_qdisc = {
>         .enqueue        =       noop_enqueue,
>         .dequeue        =       noop_dequeue,
>         .flags          =       TCQ_F_BUILTIN,
>         .ops            =       &noop_qdisc_ops,
>         .q.lock         =       __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(noop_qdisc.q.lock),
>         .dev_queue      =       &noop_netdev_queue,
>         .busylock       =       __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(noop_qdisc.busylock),
>         .gso_skb = {
>                 .next = (struct sk_buff *)&noop_qdisc.gso_skb,
>                 .prev = (struct sk_buff *)&noop_qdisc.gso_skb,
>                 .qlen = 0,
>                 .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(noop_qdisc.gso_skb.lock),
>         },
>         .skb_bad_txq = {
>                 .next = (struct sk_buff *)&noop_qdisc.skb_bad_txq,
>                 .prev = (struct sk_buff *)&noop_qdisc.skb_bad_txq,
>                 .qlen = 0,
>                 .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(noop_qdisc.skb_bad_txq.lock),
>         },
> };
>
> doesn't have an owner set, and it's obviously not allocated via
> qdisc_alloc(). Thus, it defaults to 0, so if you get to it on CPU 0 (I
> was using ARCH=um which isn't even SMP) then it will just always run
> into the
>
> > +     if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(q->owner) == smp_processor_id())) {
> > +             kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_TC_RECLASSIFY_LOOP);
> > +             return NET_XMIT_DROP;
> > +     }
>
> case.
>
> I'm not sure I understand the busylock logic well enough, so almost
> seems to me we shouldn't do this whole thing on the noop_qdisc at all,
> e.g. via tagging owner with -2 to say don't do it:
>
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -3865,9 +3865,11 @@ static inline int __dev_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *q,
>                 qdisc_run_end(q);
>                 rc = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
>         } else {
> -               WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, smp_processor_id());
> +               if (q->owner != -2)
> +                       WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, smp_processor_id());
>                 rc = dev_qdisc_enqueue(skb, q, &to_free, txq);
> -               WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, -1);
> +               if (q->owner != -2)
> +                       WRITE_ONCE(q->owner, -1);
>                 if (qdisc_run_begin(q)) {
>                         if (unlikely(contended)) {
>                                 spin_unlock(&q->busylock);
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> index 2a637a17061b..e857e4638671 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> @@ -657,6 +657,7 @@ static struct netdev_queue noop_netdev_queue = {
>  };
>
>  struct Qdisc noop_qdisc = {
> +       .owner          =       -2,
>         .enqueue        =       noop_enqueue,
>         .dequeue        =       noop_dequeue,
>         .flags          =       TCQ_F_BUILTIN,
>
>
> (and yes, I believe it doesn't need to be READ_ONCE for the check
> against -2 since that's mutually exclusive with all other values)
>
> Or maybe simply ignoring the value for the noop_qdisc:
>
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -3822,7 +3822,7 @@ static inline int __dev_xmit_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *q,
>                 return rc;
>         }
>
> -       if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(q->owner) == smp_processor_id())) {
> +       if (unlikely(q != &noop_qdisc && READ_ONCE(q->owner) == smp_processor_id())) {
>                 kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_TC_RECLASSIFY_LOOP);
>                 return NET_XMIT_DROP;
>         }
>
> That's shorter, but I'm not sure if there might be other special
> cases...
>
> Or maybe someone can think of an even better fix?

Why not simply initialize noop_qdisc.owner to -1 ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion
  2024-06-07 14:54   ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2024-06-07 14:56     ` Johannes Berg
  2024-06-07 15:53     ` [PATCH] net/sched: initialize noop_qdisc owner Johannes Berg
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2024-06-07 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Dumazet
  Cc: Victor Nogueira, davem, kuba, pabeni, jhs, jiri, xiyou.wangcong,
	netdev, renmingshuai, pctammela

On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 16:54 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > 
> > I'm not sure I understand the busylock logic well enough

> Why not simply initialize noop_qdisc.owner to -1 ?

I didn't understand the locking logic, so I was worried you could still
have it be used in parallel since it can be assigned to any number of
devices.

johannes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] net/sched: initialize noop_qdisc owner
  2024-06-07 14:54   ` Eric Dumazet
  2024-06-07 14:56     ` Johannes Berg
@ 2024-06-07 15:53     ` Johannes Berg
  2024-06-08  8:05       ` Eric Dumazet
  2024-06-11  2:40       ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2024-06-07 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Johannes Berg

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

When the noop_qdisc owner isn't initialized, then it will be 0,
so packets will erroneously be regarded as having been subject
to recursion as long as only CPU 0 queues them. For non-SMP,
that's all packets, of course. This causes a change in what's
reported to userspace, normally noop_qdisc would drop packets
silently, but with this change the syscall returns -ENOBUFS if
RECVERR is also set on the socket.

Fix this by initializing the owner field to -1, just like it
would be for dynamically allocated qdiscs by qdisc_alloc().

Fixes: 0f022d32c3ec ("net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
 net/sched/sch_generic.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index d3f6006b563c..fb32984d7a16 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -673,6 +673,7 @@ struct Qdisc noop_qdisc = {
 		.qlen = 0,
 		.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(noop_qdisc.skb_bad_txq.lock),
 	},
+	.owner = -1,
 };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(noop_qdisc);
 
-- 
2.45.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/sched: initialize noop_qdisc owner
  2024-06-07 15:53     ` [PATCH] net/sched: initialize noop_qdisc owner Johannes Berg
@ 2024-06-08  8:05       ` Eric Dumazet
  2024-06-11  2:40       ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2024-06-08  8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Berg, netdev; +Cc: Johannes Berg


On 6/7/24 17:53, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
>
> When the noop_qdisc owner isn't initialized, then it will be 0,
> so packets will erroneously be regarded as having been subject
> to recursion as long as only CPU 0 queues them. For non-SMP,
> that's all packets, of course. This causes a change in what's
> reported to userspace, normally noop_qdisc would drop packets
> silently, but with this change the syscall returns -ENOBUFS if
> RECVERR is also set on the socket.
>
> Fix this by initializing the owner field to -1, just like it
> would be for dynamically allocated qdiscs by qdisc_alloc().
>
> Fixes: 0f022d32c3ec ("net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion")
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>


I found this quite by luck.

Please CC maintainers next time, and blamed patch authors :/

Believe it or not, I do not follow netdev@ traffic.

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Thanks.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/sched: initialize noop_qdisc owner
  2024-06-07 15:53     ` [PATCH] net/sched: initialize noop_qdisc owner Johannes Berg
  2024-06-08  8:05       ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2024-06-11  2:40       ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-06-11  2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Berg; +Cc: netdev, johannes.berg

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Fri,  7 Jun 2024 17:53:32 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> 
> When the noop_qdisc owner isn't initialized, then it will be 0,
> so packets will erroneously be regarded as having been subject
> to recursion as long as only CPU 0 queues them. For non-SMP,
> that's all packets, of course. This causes a change in what's
> reported to userspace, normally noop_qdisc would drop packets
> silently, but with this change the syscall returns -ENOBUFS if
> RECVERR is also set on the socket.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - net/sched: initialize noop_qdisc owner
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/44180feaccf2

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-11  2:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-15 21:07 [PATCH net] net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion Victor Nogueira
2024-04-18  1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-06-07 14:40 ` Johannes Berg
2024-06-07 14:54   ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-07 14:56     ` Johannes Berg
2024-06-07 15:53     ` [PATCH] net/sched: initialize noop_qdisc owner Johannes Berg
2024-06-08  8:05       ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-11  2:40       ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).