From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2 v2] net: bcmgenet: TX reclaim and DMA fixes Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:43:12 -0700 Message-ID: <5420A600.4030301@gmail.com> References: <1411412083-9370-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20140922.183943.104495150444696692.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:33400 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754119AbaIVWn3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:43:29 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id ey11so5996501pad.21 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:43:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140922.183943.104495150444696692.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/22/2014 03:39 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Florian Fainelli > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:54:41 -0700 > >> This patch set contains one fix for an accounting problem while reclaiming >> transmitted buffers having fragments, and the second fix is to make sure >> that the DMA shutdown is properly controlled. > > Series applied, but I can't see how you could have possibly > functionally tested the original patch series if it didn't > even compile :-/ I cherry picked the second patch from my downstream tree which had a different function re-arrangement, and I must admit I thought I also had compiled the second patch, while I did not... -- Florian