From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: VRFs and the scalability of namespaces Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:00:54 -0600 Message-ID: <5425FE36.20401@gmail.com> References: <5425EAA6.7040302@gmail.com> <20140926165241.59cf8a60@urahara> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Stephen Hemminger , David Ahern Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:44967 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754847AbaI0AA6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2014 20:00:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id eu11so12516142pac.24 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:00:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140926165241.59cf8a60@urahara> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 9/26/14, 5:52 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:37:26 -0600 > David Ahern wrote: > >> Hi Eric: >> >> As you suggested [1] I am starting a new thread to discuss scalability >> problems using namespaces for VRFs. >> > > Whining without suggesting a solution or providing code will probably result > in no action. I have a suggestion; I was trying to set a context on the problem. David