netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: annie li <annie.li@oracle.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] xen-netfront: always keep the Rx ring full of requests
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 17:00:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5432BC96.6060709@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5432B6D2.9030503@oracle.com>

On 06/10/14 16:35, annie li wrote:
> 
> On 2014/10/2 9:33, David Vrabel wrote:
>> A full Rx ring only requires 1 MiB of memory.  This is not enough
>> memory that it is useful to dynamically scale the number of Rx
>> requests in the ring based on traffic rates.
>>
>> Keeping the ring full of Rx requests handles bursty traffic better
>> than trying to converges on an optimal number of requests to keep
>> filled.
>>
>> On a 4 core host, an iperf -P 64 -t 60 run from dom0 to a 4 VCPU guest
>> improved from 5.1 Gbit/s to 5.6 Gbit/s.  Gains with more bursty
>> traffic are expected to be higher.
> 
> Although removing sysfs is connected with the code change for full Rx
> ring utilization, I assume it is better to split this patch into two to
> make it simpler?

I don't see how splitting the patch would be an improvement.

>>   +    queue->rx.req_prod_pvt = req_prod;
>> +
>> +    /* Not enough requests? Try again later. */
>> +    if (req_prod - queue->rx.rsp_cons < NET_RX_SLOTS_MIN) {
>> +        mod_timer(&queue->rx_refill_timer, jiffies + (HZ/10));
>> +        return;
> 
> If the previous for loop breaks because of failure of
> xennet_alloc_one_rx_buffer, then notify_remote_via_irq is missed here if
> the code returns directly.

This is deliberate -- there's no point notifying the backend if there
aren't enough requests for the next packet.  Since we don't know what
the next packet might be we assume it's the largest possible.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-06 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-02 13:33 [PATCHv1] xen-netfront: always keep the Rx ring full of requests David Vrabel
2014-10-02 13:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2014-10-02 13:55   ` David Vrabel
2014-10-03 22:54 ` David Miller
2014-10-06 15:35 ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
2014-10-06 16:00   ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-10-06 18:41     ` annie li
2014-10-06 21:07       ` David Miller
2014-10-07  9:43         ` David Vrabel
2014-10-07 13:12           ` annie li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5432BC96.6060709@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=annie.li@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).