netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hong Zhiguo <honkiko@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Tao, Yue" <Yue.Tao@windriver.com>,
	Alexandre Dietsch <alexandre.dietsch@windriver.com>,
	zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ipv4: net namespace does not inherit network configurations
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:20:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <543B8B57.80108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHA+R7MC2gKeSWqR8pDDX26D-Th4BG1AveM+HseMMPjLBJuWDw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi, Miller && Cong

Can we merge this patch into kernel mainline? since the independence
between ipv4 and ipv6 is inconsistent even in the latest linux 
kernel(3.17-rc7),
that is, the net namespace is independent in ipv6 while it is not in ipv4.

Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun

On 07/30/2014 01:48 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:29 AM, zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,all
>>
>> I did a test on kernel3.16 rc6:
>>
>> root@qemu1:~# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
>> root@qemu1:~# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/forwarding
>> root@qemu1:~# ip netns list
>> root@qemu1:~# ip netns add fib1
>> root@qemu1:~# ip netns exec fib1 bash
>> root@qemu1:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding
>> 0
>> root@qemu1:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/forwarding
>> 1
>>
>> The behavior of ipv4 and ipv6 is very inconsistent. I checked
>> the kernel source code. I found that from this patch
>> [ipv6: fix bad free of addrconf_init_net], the above difference
>> appeared.
>>
>> Since a net namespace is independent to another. That is, there
>> is no any relationship between the net namespaces. So the behavior
>> of ipv4 is not correct.
>>
> Well, they are already independent, not shared, just that the initial
> value is duplicated from init_net for IPv4.
>
> This change might break existing applications which rely on this
> behavior, but given IPv6 change is almost the same, I think it's ok.
>
> BTW, you need to submit a patch as normal, instead of as an attachment.
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-13  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-29  9:29 ipv4: net namespace does not inherit network configurations zhuyj
2014-07-29 17:48 ` Cong Wang
2014-07-31  1:59   ` zhuyj
2014-10-13  8:20   ` zhuyj [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=543B8B57.80108@gmail.com \
    --to=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    --cc=Yue.Tao@windriver.com \
    --cc=alexandre.dietsch@windriver.com \
    --cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=honkiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).