From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yzhu1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar: disable vlan tag insertion by default on 2.6.x Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:15:37 +0800 Message-ID: <543E4949.1050606@windriver.com> References: <1413367234-28652-1-git-send-email-Yanjun.Zhu@windriver.com> <20141015100949.GA30089@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , zhuyj To: Willy Tarreau , Zhu Yanjun Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141015100949.GA30089@1wt.eu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 10/15/2014 06:09 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Zhu, > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 06:00:33PM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >> In commit f43c75d4b6[gianfar: disable TX vlan based on kernel 2.6.x], >> gianfar nic disables TX vlan. But gianfar nic enables vlan tag >> insertion by default. This will lead to unusable connections on >> some configurations. Since vlan tag insertion is disabled by default >> and it is not enabled any longer, it is not necessary to disable it again. >> >> Zhu Yanjun (1): >> gianfar: disable vlan tag insertion by default >> >> drivers/net/gianfar.c | 6 ------ >> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 1.9.1 > There's no patch in this e-mail. Since you sent another e-mail with almost > the same subject, I'm confused, it's unclear to me whether I only need to > apply the patch in the other one with this commit message or if it's just > that you accidently dropped the patch when sending this e-mail. Could you > please enlighten me ? > > Thanks, > Willy > Hi, Willy Sorry. Please apply the patch in the other one with this commit message. Thanks a lot. Zhu Yanjun