From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/15] net: dsa: Add support for switch EEPROM access Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 06:22:35 -0700 Message-ID: <544E471B.8080507@roeck-us.net> References: <1414342365-27191-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1414342365-27191-10-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20141027024121.GA16998@lunn.ch> <544DC264.9020600@roeck-us.net> <20141027085048.GC4748@netboy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Richard Cochran Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141027085048.GC4748@netboy> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 10/27/2014 01:50 AM, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 08:56:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> Also, it seems that you request two separate properties, one for presence >> and another for length. Is that correct ? Again, I thought that would not >> provide any value since presence is indicated by length != 0 in the ethtool >> callback function. No problem, though, I'll be happy to create two separate >> properties and platform data variables if you think that would be better. > > The fewer properties, the better. > Right now I have: Optional properties: - eeprom-length : Set to the length of an EEPROM connected to the switch. Must be set if the switch can not detect the presence and/or size of a connected EEPROM, otherwise optional. and I think Andrew is asking for the following: Optional properties: - eeprom-present : Boolean property indicating that an EEPROM is present. Must be set if an EEPROM is present. - eeprom-length : Set to the length of an EEPROM connected to the switch. Must be set if the switch can not detect the size of a connected EEPROM, otherwise optional. Platform data semantics would be the same. I can go either way, but I would like to get some kind of agreement before I jump into writing the code. Thanks, Guenter