From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Kleine-Budde Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] can: m_can: update to support CAN FD features Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:24:23 +0100 Message-ID: <5465CA47.4020802@pengutronix.de> References: <1415349914-9145-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <1415349914-9145-2-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <54648382.9080105@pengutronix.de> <5464E2D7.7010906@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BQIn7E2fRmCxX6Uqa7J2wpvSQ8R8OSF6s" Cc: wg@grandegger.com, varkabhadram@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Oliver Hartkopp , Dong Aisheng , linux-can@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5464E2D7.7010906@hartkopp.net> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --BQIn7E2fRmCxX6Uqa7J2wpvSQ8R8OSF6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/13/2014 05:56 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > On 11/13/2014 11:10 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 11/07/2014 09:45 AM, Dong Aisheng wrote: >=20 >>> =20 >>> - if (id & RX_BUF_RTR) { >>> + if (id & RX_BUF_ESI) { >>> + cf->flags |=3D CANFD_ESI; >>> + netdev_dbg(dev, "ESI Error\n"); >>> + } >>> + >>> + if (!(dlc & RX_BUF_EDL) && (id & RX_BUF_RTR)) { >>> cf->can_id |=3D CAN_RTR_FLAG; >> >> I just noticed, that you don't set the cf->dlc (or cf->len) in the RTR= >> case. Please create a separate patch that fixes this problem. >> >>> } else { >>> id =3D m_can_fifo_read(priv, fgi, M_CAN_FIFO_DLC); >>> - cf->can_dlc =3D get_can_dlc((id >> 16) & 0x0F); >>> - *(u32 *)(cf->data + 0) =3D m_can_fifo_read(priv, fgi, >>> - M_CAN_FIFO_DATA(0)); >>> - *(u32 *)(cf->data + 4) =3D m_can_fifo_read(priv, fgi, >>> - M_CAN_FIFO_DATA(1)); >>> + if (dlc & RX_BUF_EDL) >>> + cf->len =3D can_dlc2len((id >> 16) & 0x0F); >>> + else >>> + cf->len =3D get_can_dlc((id >> 16) & 0x0F); >>> + >=20 > Grr. I missed that one too :-( >=20 > Thanks for catching it. >=20 > As you committed patch 1 & 3 you expect a new single patch containing t= he > (fixed) content of this patch 2, right? No, please make it two patches: First the Bugfix: One setting the cf->dlc in the RTR case, too. Then the new feature: The other one adding CAN-FD support. Marc --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | --BQIn7E2fRmCxX6Uqa7J2wpvSQ8R8OSF6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUZcpHAAoJECte4hHFiupUJksP/jOeNEMnKC2vEl8+v+c0Gj07 o6Pa/ijqSIPbB+nXakF2Lef8WcHVeoklmbCnYirDIRD9mIfQgB4hDtixybA1/9l4 td5HhRGC3Qy2ds669Z0LQs6U0OxUbGqC6jcpcD5IO9/v9ITUY6C/uwugVvZO4yC2 Mu3fTNrIz3J8am9igqrh540lIYbYPIrtwKe2giO7vaThpioO84BIhczMQcIbW+2z y2Bv2rfjrPFsYbqrVODoNxzmSIyhWCwmeL8WufGTbR3cP873QcsifSA3C9QEka3Q mCT5F6n3Euqqftsp20HNx49zOUS5QW7Hana5EuPtV9+Cm0EWIwucPgHOxCgiqt+C mSUxebPheQG+0+Upv/0xeF6Gv455lGXNOuJG0Iw6qX+rJ0kvGsxzt0dajxuqdr18 xzFnY7qfz3zuy0FqFFSI2AwEuQww/HkIRVejVEx0jYzZ1ibdNUXcLLXFSf9u5Uv4 QnyUCVl/mPinFcARx1TkMrucvPMk6cqKnIggbrAkXBrLDKxknShMh/ZR/NfQjH9P GCavjPiz66drRzv2yCNWyQneF5jjC1rLRbZLgUU8lg21wB0hqN4NwmI1+RGPi+gX JpA9HyCflSVTyM0eQPSEUNQ8j4/A8yIjua4pD6CGgBKMM2f2bYI3W+TIfhkFK/tL 3o0V+qvHjAYnVXKxmSM1 =w+nt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BQIn7E2fRmCxX6Uqa7J2wpvSQ8R8OSF6s--