From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rapier Subject: Question about Patch Submissions Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:13:09 -0500 Message-ID: <546B9A45.9040509@psc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mailer1.psc.edu ([128.182.58.100]:56937 "EHLO mailer1.psc.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753867AbaKRURO (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:17:14 -0500 Received: from iztli.psc.edu (iztli.psc.edu [128.182.160.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailer1.psc.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sAIJD9Nk010969 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:13:09 -0500 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I've read the documentation I've been able to find on the patch submission process. I was hoping to clarify one thing though. When submitting a patch that spans multiple files and functions is it better to break the submission down by function or by file? Thanks for your time, Chris