From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net: sched: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree" Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:26:59 +0100 Message-ID: <546BAB93.4010406@users.sourceforge.net> References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.so urceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Coccinelle To: "David S. Miller" , Jamal Hadi Salim , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Markus Elfring Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:21:16 +0100 The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring --- net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c index 0e30d58..f323944 100644 --- a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c +++ b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c @@ -212,8 +212,7 @@ static int cls_bpf_modify_existing(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, if (fp_old) bpf_prog_destroy(fp_old); - if (bpf_old) - kfree(bpf_old); + kfree(bpf_old); return 0; -- 2.1.3