From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH net V5] virtio-net: validate features during probe Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:52:50 +0800 Message-ID: <546DB9F2.2020806@redhat.com> References: <1416474185-10981-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <20141120104824.0a9e2060.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Cornelia Huck Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141120104824.0a9e2060.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 11/20/2014 05:48 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:03:05 +0800 > Jason Wang wrote: > >> We currently trigger BUG when VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ >> is not set but one of features depending on it is. >> That's not a friendly way to report errors to >> hypervisors. >> Let's check, and fail probe instead. >> >> Cc: Rusty Russell >> Cc: Cornelia Huck >> Cc: Wanlong Gao >> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang >> +static bool virtnet_validate_features(struct virtio_device *vdev) >> +{ >> + if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ) && >> + (VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX, >> + "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ") || >> + VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN, >> + "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ") || >> + VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE, >> + "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ") || >> + VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ, "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ") || >> + VIRTNET_FAIL_ON(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR, >> + "VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ"))) { >> + return false; >> + } >> + >> + return true; >> +} > I still think it may make sense to print all incorrectly set bits, but > let's just fix the BUG() trigger for now. > > Acked-by: Cornelia Huck > Right, will do it in the future. Thanks