netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
Cc: "Roopa Prabhu" <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
	"Jiří Pírko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	"Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	"Benjamin LaHaise" <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	"Thomas Graf" <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"John Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"nhorman@tuxdriver.com" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"Nicolas Dichtel" <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
	"vyasevic@redhat.com" <vyasevic@redhat.com>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"buytenh@wantstofly.org" <buytenh@wantstofly.org>,
	"Aviad Raveh" <aviadr@mellanox.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	shm@cumulusnetworks.com,
	"Andy Gospodarek" <gospo@cumulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bridge: offload bridge port attributes to switch asic if feature flag set
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:55:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <548156C8.5060602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE4R7bBOCgoH0zL6+82jj2qjcP8n3kSo51x+i5SoqkN8Ff1CBQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/04/2014 10:41 PM, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:26 PM,  <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>
>> This allows offloading to switch asic without having the user to set
>> any flag. And this is done in the bridge driver to rollback kernel settings
>> on hw offload failure if required in the future.
>>
>> With this, it also makes sure a notification goes out only after the
>> attributes are set both in the kernel and hw.
>
> I like this approach as it streamlines the steps for the user in
> setting port flags.  There is one case for FLOODING where you'll have
> to turn off flooding for both, and then turn on flooding in hw.  You
> don't want flooding turned on on kernel and hw.
>
>> ---
>>   net/bridge/br_netlink.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
>> index 9f5eb55..ce173f0 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
>> @@ -407,9 +407,21 @@ int br_setlink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
>>                                  afspec, RTM_SETLINK);
>>          }
>>
>> +       if ((dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD) &&
>> +                       dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bridge_setlink) {
>> +               int ret = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bridge_setlink(dev, nlh);
>
> I think you want to up-level this to net/core/rtnetlink.c because
> you're only enabling the feature for one instance of a driver that
> implements ndo_bridge_setlink: the bridge driver.  If another driver
> was MASTER and implemented ndo_bridge_setlink, you'd want same check
> to push setting down to SELF port driver.

Also if the user set SELF && MASTER flags && had HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD bit
set we would call ndo_bridge_setlink twice on the dev. Maybe you can
catch this case in rtnetlink.c and only call it once.

>
>> +               if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>> +                       /* XXX Fix this in the future to rollback
>> +                        * kernel settings and return error
>> +                        */
>
> The future is now.  Let's fix this now for the rollback case (again up
> in rtnetlink.c).  So then a general question comes to mind: for these
> dual target sets, is it best to try HW first and then SW, or the other
> way around?  Either way, on failure on second you need to rollback
> first.  And, on failure, you need to know rollback value for first, so
> you have to do a getlink on first before attempting set.

It might be helpful to return some indication of what object failed as
well.

>
>> +                       br_warn(p->br, "error offloading bridge attributes "
>> +                                       "on port %u(%s)\n", (unsigned int) p->port_no,
>> +                                       p->dev->name);
>> +               }
>> +       }
>> +
>>          if (err == 0)
>>                  br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, p);
>> -
>>   out:
>>          return err;
>>   }
>> @@ -433,6 +445,19 @@ int br_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
>>          err = br_afspec((struct net_bridge *)netdev_priv(dev), p,
>>                          afspec, RTM_DELLINK);
>>
>> +       if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD
>> +                       && dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bridge_setlink) {
>> +               int ret = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bridge_dellink(dev, nlh);
>> +               if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
>> +                       /* XXX Fix this in the future to rollback
>> +                        * kernel settings and return error
>> +                        */
>> +                       br_warn(p->br, "error offloading bridge attributes "
>> +                                       "on port %u(%s)\n", (unsigned int) p->port_no,
>> +                                       p->dev->name);
>> +               }
>> +       }
>> +
>
> Same comments as setlink above.
>
>>          return err;
>>   }
>>   static int br_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
>>


-- 
John Fastabend         Intel Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-05  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-05  2:26 [PATCH 2/3] bridge: offload bridge port attributes to switch asic if feature flag set roopa
2014-12-05  6:41 ` Scott Feldman
2014-12-05  6:55   ` John Fastabend [this message]
2014-12-05  7:10     ` Roopa Prabhu
2014-12-05 12:41       ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-12-05 14:03         ` Roopa Prabhu
2014-12-05  7:02   ` Roopa Prabhu
2014-12-05 23:21     ` Arad, Ronen
2014-12-06  1:04       ` Arad, Ronen
2014-12-06  2:46         ` John Fastabend
2014-12-06  3:06           ` Arad, Ronen
2014-12-06  3:21             ` John Fastabend
2014-12-06  6:29         ` Scott Feldman
2014-12-06  8:05           ` Arad, Ronen
2014-12-07 17:33             ` Roopa Prabhu
2014-12-06  6:54       ` Scott Feldman
2014-12-07 20:24         ` Roopa Prabhu
2014-12-08  4:56           ` Roopa Prabhu
2014-12-08 11:14           ` Jiri Pirko
2014-12-08 18:40           ` Arad, Ronen
2014-12-07 19:13       ` Roopa Prabhu
2014-12-05  7:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2014-12-05 13:44   ` Roopa Prabhu
2014-12-05 14:37   ` Roopa Prabhu
2014-12-05 12:07 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-12-05 13:21 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-12-05 14:04   ` Roopa Prabhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=548156C8.5060602@gmail.com \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=aviadr@mellanox.com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=sfeldma@gmail.com \
    --cc=shm@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).