From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: John <jw@nuclearfallout.net>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <Xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xen-netback: make feature-rx-notify mandatory -- Breaks stubdoms
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:12:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548854C3.7060008@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54884DA8.7030003@nuclearfallout.net>
On 10/12/14 13:42, John wrote:
> David,
>
> This patch you put into 3.18.0 appears to break the latest version of
> stubdomains. I found this out today when I tried to update a machine to
> 3.18.0 and all of the domUs crashed on start with the dmesg output like
> this:
Cc'ing the lists and relevant netback maintainers.
I guess the stubdoms are using minios's netfront? This is something I
forgot about when deciding if it was ok to make this feature mandatory.
The patch cannot be reverted as it's a prerequisite for a critical
(security) bug fix. I am also unconvinced that the no-feature-rx-notify
support worked correctly anyway.
This can be resolved by:
- Fixing minios's netfront to support feature-rx-notify. This should be
easy but wouldn't help existing Xen deployments.
Or:
- Reimplement feature-rx-notify support. I think the easiest way is to
queue packets on the guest Rx internal queue with a short expiry time.
> [ 83.045785] device vif2.0 entered promiscuous mode
> [ 83.059220] vif vif-2-0: 22 feature-rx-notify is mandatory
> [ 83.060763] vif vif-2-0: 1 mapping in shared page 2047 from domain 2
> [ 83.060861] vif vif-2-0: 1 mapping shared-frames 2047/2046 port tx 4
> rx 4
>
> This is on the very latest patched version of 4.4.
David
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <54884DA8.7030003@nuclearfallout.net>
2014-12-10 14:12 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-12-10 15:07 ` xen-netback: make feature-rx-notify mandatory -- Breaks stubdoms Ian Campbell
2014-12-10 15:29 ` David Vrabel
2014-12-10 16:20 ` Ian Campbell
2014-12-10 18:39 ` David Vrabel
2014-12-17 14:00 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-12-17 23:29 ` John
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548854C3.7060008@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jw@nuclearfallout.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).