netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	'Alexander Duyck' <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"eric.dumazet@gmail.com" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Ariel Elior <ariel.elior@qlogic.com>,
	"brouer@redhat.com" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	Gary Zambrano <zambrano@broadcom.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"ast@plumgrid.com" <ast@plumgrid.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 6/6] ethernet/broadcom: Use napi_alloc_skb instead of netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:16:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <548863BE.302@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CA09DA9@AcuExch.aculab.com>

On 12/10/2014 01:52 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: David Laight
>> From: Alexander Duyck
>>> This patch replaces the calls to netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align in the
>>> copybreak paths.
>> Why?
>>
>> You still want the IP header to be aligned and you also want the
>> memcpy() to be copying aligned data.
>>
>> I suspect this fails on both counts?
> Or am I confused by the naming?
>
> 	David
>

The bit you are missing is that napi_alloc_skb is always IP aligned. 
The general idea with napi_alloc_skb is that it is a cheaper way
allocate frames that are about to be passed up the stack as a NAPI or
GRO receive so the IP aligned part is a given.

- Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-10 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-10  3:40 [net-next PATCH 0/6] net: Alloc NAPI page frags from their own pool Alexander Duyck
2014-12-10  3:40 ` [net-next PATCH 1/6] net: Split netdev_alloc_frag into __alloc_page_frag and add __napi_alloc_frag Alexander Duyck
2014-12-10  4:16   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-12-10 15:21     ` Alexander Duyck
2014-12-10 16:02   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-12-10 17:06     ` Alexander Duyck
2014-12-10 17:13       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-12-10 17:16         ` Alexander Duyck
2014-12-10  3:40 ` [net-next PATCH 2/6] net: Pull out core bits of __netdev_alloc_skb and add __napi_alloc_skb Alexander Duyck
2014-12-10  3:40 ` [net-next PATCH 3/6] ethernet/intel: Use napi_alloc_skb Alexander Duyck
2014-12-11 21:43   ` Jeff Kirsher
2014-12-10  3:41 ` [net-next PATCH 4/6] cxgb: Use napi_alloc_skb instead of netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align Alexander Duyck
2014-12-10  3:41 ` [net-next PATCH 5/6] ethernet/realtek: use " Alexander Duyck
2014-12-10  3:41 ` [net-next PATCH 6/6] ethernet/broadcom: Use " Alexander Duyck
2014-12-10  9:50   ` David Laight
2014-12-10  9:52     ` David Laight
2014-12-10 15:16       ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2014-12-10 14:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Faster than SLAB caching of SKBs with qmempool (backed by alf_queue) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-12-10 14:15   ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] lib: adding an Array-based Lock-Free (ALF) queue Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-12-11 19:15     ` David Miller
2014-12-10 14:15   ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: qmempool - quick queue based memory pool Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-12-10 14:15   ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] net: use qmempool in-front of sk_buff kmem_cache Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-12-10 14:22   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Faster than SLAB caching of SKBs with qmempool (backed by alf_queue) David Laight
2014-12-10 14:40     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-12-10 15:17   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-12-10 15:33     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
     [not found]       ` <20141210163321.0e4e4fd2-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-10 16:17         ` Christoph Lameter
2014-12-10 19:51   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-12-11 10:18     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-12-10 18:32 ` [net-next PATCH 0/6] net: Alloc NAPI page frags from their own pool David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=548863BE.302@gmail.com \
    --to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
    --cc=ariel.elior@qlogic.com \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zambrano@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).