From: Nagendra Tomar <tomer_iisc@yahoo.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Nagendra Tomar <tomer_iisc@yahoo.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc6 Resending] NETWORKING : Edge Triggered EPOLLOUT events get missed for TCP sockets
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:24:53 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <549830.78824.qm@web53705.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709201048290.8897@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
--- Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately f_op->poll() does not let the caller to specify the events
> it's interested in, that would allow to split send/recevie wait queues and
> better detect read/write cases.
> The detection of a waitqueue_active(->sk_wr_sleep) would work fine in
> detecting is someone is actually waiting for a write, w/out the false
> positives triggered by the read-waiters.
> That would be a very sane thing to do, but would require a big&dumb change
> to all the ->poll around (that could be automated by a script - devices
> not caring about the events hint can just continue to use the single queue
> like they currently do), and a more critical and gradual change of all the
> devices that wants to take advantage of it.
> That way, no more magic bits are needed, and a simple waitqueue_active()
> would tell you if someone is waiting for write-space events.
>
I like this.
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-20 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 22:37 [PATCH 2.6.23-rc6 Resending] NETWORKING : Edge Triggered EPOLLOUT events get missed for TCP sockets Nagendra Tomar
2007-09-19 22:44 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 22:55 ` Nagendra Tomar
2007-09-19 23:10 ` David Miller
2007-09-19 23:32 ` Nagendra Tomar
2007-09-19 23:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-09-19 23:50 ` Nagendra Tomar
2007-09-20 5:43 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-09-20 6:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-09-20 8:02 ` Nagendra Tomar
2007-09-20 17:56 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-09-20 22:24 ` Nagendra Tomar [this message]
2007-09-20 17:42 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-09-20 22:09 ` Nagendra Tomar
2007-09-20 22:37 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-09-20 22:58 ` Nagendra Tomar
2007-09-21 17:45 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=549830.78824.qm@web53705.mail.re2.yahoo.com \
--to=tomer_iisc@yahoo.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).