From: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@gmail.com>,
"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ipw2200: select CFG80211_WEXT"
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:14:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AA641C.7050307@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420324124.9624.60.camel@x220>
On 01/03/15 23:28, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-03 at 10:07 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Marcel Holtmann<marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> why would you revert this? It is obviously the correct change to actually select CFG80211_WEXT.
>>
>> I don't know about obvious, but yeah, I think the select in this case
>> is actually the better idea anyway.
>
> Obviously it wasn't obvious to me!
>
> My reasoning was that the "ipw2200: select CFG80211_WEXT" commit was
> _solely_ a workaround for the breakage introduced by that other patch.
> And since that one is now reverted the workaround wasn't needed anymore.
>
> Besied, I thought we try to avoid select-ing symbols that can also be
> set manually. As that makes it more likely to trigger circular
> dependency problems in the kconfig tools, doesn't it?
>
>> We could make the CFG80211_WEXT help message be very negative so that
>> people aren't encouraged to select it even if they can, but then if
>> they need the ipw driver it gets selected because of that. Because the
>> ipw driver is probably the more important of the two if you just
>> happen to have old hardware but are upgrading yout software (and
>> anybody who recompiles their own kernel is obviously doing the
>> latter).
>
> Side note: am I correct in thinking that there's some successor to
> CFG80211_WEXT and that the ipw2200 driver could, at least in theory, be
> ported to that successor? (ipw2200 hardware appears to be a bit old, so
> probably no one would care enough to actually do that.)
> net/wireless/kconfig doesn't mention anything like that, so probably I'm
> just confused.
ipw2200 is a WEXT driver using some wext functionality (and struct
wiphy) provided by cfg80211 hence it needs CFG80211_WEXT. I guess that
is what makes it confusing.
Regards,
Arend
> Paul Bolle
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-05 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-03 14:59 [PATCH] Revert "ipw2200: select CFG80211_WEXT" Paul Bolle
2015-01-03 18:02 ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-01-03 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <CA+55aFzYSiUkntraMrHEhMzkt35Ft2p9E3cT7ejwQOBDwKvcOg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-03 22:28 ` Paul Bolle
2015-01-05 10:05 ` Johannes Berg
2015-01-05 10:12 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-01-05 10:20 ` Johannes Berg
2015-01-05 10:14 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2015-01-05 17:38 ` Paul Bolle
2015-01-05 18:22 ` Arend van Spriel
2015-01-05 18:57 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1420484224.9459.16.camel-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-05 22:05 ` Paul Bolle
2015-01-05 22:13 ` Arend van Spriel
[not found] ` <54AB0C75.1090204-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-06 8:19 ` Johannes Berg
2015-01-06 8:23 ` Johannes Berg
2015-01-06 13:26 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1420297188.2397.3.camel-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-06 8:03 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AA641C.7050307@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=stas.yakovlev@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).