From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] bridge: Add ability to enable TSO
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:22:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AF73AD.4000008@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1138400428.6686751.1420782286490.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On 2015/01/09 14:44, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>
>>
>> Currently a bridge device turns off TSO feature if no bridge ports
>> support it. We can always enable it, since packets can be segmented on
>> ports by software as well as on the bridge device.
>> This will reduce the number of packets processed in the bridge.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>> ---
>> v2: Use an existing helper function.
>>
>> net/bridge/br_if.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
>> index ed307db..81e49fb 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
>> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ netdev_features_t br_features_recompute(struct net_bridge
>> *br,
>> features = netdev_increment_features(features,
>> p->dev->features, mask);
>> }
>> + features = netdev_add_tso_features(features, mask);
>
> Just a doubt. Are we inducing latency if source has traffic at very low rate.
> I mean by default do we need it?
Is your concern tcp_tso_should_defer() in tcp_write_xmit()?
If so, since TSO packet is created by GSO even without this patch, this
should not increase latency there.
This patch just delays the point of software segmentation from the
bridge device to its port.
Thanks,
Toshiaki Makita
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-09 5:16 [PATCH v2 net-next] bridge: Add ability to enable TSO Toshiaki Makita
2015-01-09 5:44 ` Pankaj Gupta
2015-01-09 6:22 ` Toshiaki Makita [this message]
2015-01-09 19:10 ` Pankaj Gupta
2015-01-12 21:18 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AF73AD.4000008@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--to=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).