netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, danny.zhou@intel.com,
	nhorman@tuxdriver.com, john.ronciak@intel.com,
	hannes@stressinduktion.org, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] net: af_packet support for direct ring access in user space
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:05:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B54266.4040205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B540BB.2090507@gmail.com>

On 01/13/2015 04:58 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 01/13/2015 07:12 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
...
>> Any slight chance these 8 ndo ops could be further reduced? ;)
>
> Its possible we could collapse a few of these calls. I'll see if
> we can get it a bit smaller. Another option would be to put a
> a pointer to the set of ops in the net_device struct. Something
> like,
>
>      struct net_device {
>          ...
>          const struct af_packet_hw *afp_ops;
>          ...
>      }
>
>      struct af_packet_hw {
>          int (*ndo_split_queue_pairs)(struct net_device *dev,
>                           unsigned int qpairs_start_from,
>                           unsigned int qpairs_num,
>                           struct sock *sk);
>          ...
>      }

I think trying to collapse might be better than two indirections.

...
>> When this is being set here, above test in packet_release() and the chunk
>> quoted below in packet_mmap() are not guaranteed to work since we don't
>> test if some ndos are actually implemented by the driver. Seems a bit
>> fragile, I'm wondering if we should test this capability as a _whole_,
>> iow if all necessary functions to make this work are being provided by the
>> driver, e.g. flag the netdev as such and test for that instead.
>
> Sounds good to me, better than scattering ndo checks throughout. Also
> with a feature flag administrators could disable it easily.

Sounds good to me, thanks John!

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-13 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-13  4:35 [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] net: af_packet support for direct ring access in user space John Fastabend
2015-01-13  4:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: implement af_packet direct queue mappings John Fastabend
2015-01-13 12:05   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-01-13 14:26   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-13 15:46     ` John Fastabend
2015-01-13 18:18       ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-13 18:58   ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-13  4:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] net: af_packet support for direct ring access in user space John Fastabend
2015-01-13 12:35 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-01-13 13:21   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-13 15:24     ` John Fastabend
2015-01-13 17:15       ` David Laight
2015-01-13 17:27         ` David Miller
2015-01-14 15:28           ` Zhou, Danny
2015-01-13 15:12 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-13 15:58   ` John Fastabend
2015-01-13 16:05     ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-01-13 16:19 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-13 18:52 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-14 15:26   ` Zhou, Danny
2015-01-14 20:35 ` David Miller
2015-01-17 17:35   ` John Fastabend
2015-01-18 22:02   ` Neil Horman
2015-01-19 21:45   ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B54266.4040205@redhat.com \
    --to=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=danny.zhou@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).