From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, danny.zhou@intel.com,
nhorman@tuxdriver.com, john.ronciak@intel.com,
hannes@stressinduktion.org, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] net: af_packet support for direct ring access in user space
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:05:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B54266.4040205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B540BB.2090507@gmail.com>
On 01/13/2015 04:58 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 01/13/2015 07:12 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
...
>> Any slight chance these 8 ndo ops could be further reduced? ;)
>
> Its possible we could collapse a few of these calls. I'll see if
> we can get it a bit smaller. Another option would be to put a
> a pointer to the set of ops in the net_device struct. Something
> like,
>
> struct net_device {
> ...
> const struct af_packet_hw *afp_ops;
> ...
> }
>
> struct af_packet_hw {
> int (*ndo_split_queue_pairs)(struct net_device *dev,
> unsigned int qpairs_start_from,
> unsigned int qpairs_num,
> struct sock *sk);
> ...
> }
I think trying to collapse might be better than two indirections.
...
>> When this is being set here, above test in packet_release() and the chunk
>> quoted below in packet_mmap() are not guaranteed to work since we don't
>> test if some ndos are actually implemented by the driver. Seems a bit
>> fragile, I'm wondering if we should test this capability as a _whole_,
>> iow if all necessary functions to make this work are being provided by the
>> driver, e.g. flag the netdev as such and test for that instead.
>
> Sounds good to me, better than scattering ndo checks throughout. Also
> with a feature flag administrators could disable it easily.
Sounds good to me, thanks John!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-13 4:35 [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] net: af_packet support for direct ring access in user space John Fastabend
2015-01-13 4:35 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] net: ixgbe: implement af_packet direct queue mappings John Fastabend
2015-01-13 12:05 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-01-13 14:26 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-13 15:46 ` John Fastabend
2015-01-13 18:18 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-13 18:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-13 4:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] net: af_packet support for direct ring access in user space John Fastabend
2015-01-13 12:35 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-01-13 13:21 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-13 15:24 ` John Fastabend
2015-01-13 17:15 ` David Laight
2015-01-13 17:27 ` David Miller
2015-01-14 15:28 ` Zhou, Danny
2015-01-13 15:12 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-13 15:58 ` John Fastabend
2015-01-13 16:05 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-01-13 16:19 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-13 18:52 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-14 15:26 ` Zhou, Danny
2015-01-14 20:35 ` David Miller
2015-01-17 17:35 ` John Fastabend
2015-01-18 22:02 ` Neil Horman
2015-01-19 21:45 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B54266.4040205@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=danny.zhou@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).