From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Toppins Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] bonding: keep bond interface carrier off until at least one active member Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:27:05 -0500 Message-ID: <54BF38A9.7070608@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <1421423848-414-1-git-send-email-jtoppins@cumulusnetworks.com> <1421423848-414-2-git-send-email-jtoppins@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netdev , Andy Gospodarek To: Scott Feldman Return-path: Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:35495 "EHLO mail-qc0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750796AbbAUF1H (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:27:07 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id b13so15941126qcw.0 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:27:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 1/19/15 5:15 PM, Scott Feldman wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2015 7:57 AM, "Jonathan Toppins" > > wrote: > > > > From: Scott Feldman > > > Hmmmm, this feels a little creepy, sending a patch from my past. I do > appreciate the attribution, but I can't ACK or NACK or even comment as > I've lost the context around this patch. And I'm afraid I'll break out > in hives if I look at the bonding code again, so if you don't mind, > please remove me from this patch. Thank you. > Have removed you for v2 of series, should we consider this a blanket statement for any other patches we might be releasing that you had a hand in? There were a few ;)