From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] caif: remove wrong dev_net_set() call Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:50:15 +0100 Message-ID: <54C78987.7020908@6wind.com> References: <1422307694-10079-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <1422307694-10079-2-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <54C777D0.6090608@6wind.com> <874mrcwg3q.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dmitry.tarnyagin@lockless.no, arvid.brodin@alten.se, alex.aring@gmail.com, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?U2p1ciBCcsOm?= =?UTF-8?B?bmRlbGFuZA==?= , Dmitry Tarnyagin To: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDuHJuIE1vcms=?= Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:41546 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932465AbbA0MuS (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:50:18 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id em10so4715114wid.5 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:50:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874mrcwg3q.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 27/01/2015 13:41, Bj=C3=B8rn Mork a =C3=A9crit : > Nicolas Dichtel writes: > >>> CC: Sjur Br=C3=A6ndeland >>> CC: Dmitry Tarnyagin >> >> I got a "Delivery Status Notification (Failure)" for Dmitry Tarnyagi= n >> (I took the email address from the MAINTAINERS file): >> >> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: >> >> dmitry.tarnyagin@lockless.no >> >> Technical details of permanent failure: >> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the = server for >> the recipient domain lockless.no by mail.lockless.no. [46.29.221.= 38]. >> >> The error that the other server returned was: >> 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejec= ted: User >> unknown in virtual mailbox table >> >> Any suggestions? > > > He used a gmail address in commit dd9dfb9f95e2 ("cfg80211: merge in > beacon ies of hidden bss."). Probably by accident, but worth trying > anyway... Ok, I will wait a bit before trying this address. > > I guess the stericsson.com addresses could be failing silently now? R= ef > http://stericsson.com/ . Or are they still routed to the named recepi= ents? I got also a delivery failure for sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com Thank you, Nicolas