From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: A problem about ICMP packet-too-big message handler
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:16:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54C9A600.9080004@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150128121026.GM13046@secunet.com>
On 2015/1/28 20:10, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:58:53PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My kernel is 3.10 LTS.
>>
>> I got a problem here about handling ICMP packet-too-big message.
>>
>> Before sending a packet-too-big packet :
>>
>> # ip -6 route list table local
>> local ::1 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::1 dev lo metric 0 //It does not have expire value
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:2 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::5054:ff:fe12:3456 dev lo metric 0
>>
>>
>> After sending a packet-too-big packet
>>
>> ip -6 route list table local
>> local ::1 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::1 dev lo metric 0 expires _597_ //It has expire value
>
> Is this route still present after the expiration time is elapsed?
>
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:2 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::5054:ff:fe12:3456 dev lo metric 0
>>
>> When time is up, I can't ping fe80::1 .
>> Is it ok or a bug ?
>
> This looks pretty similar to a bug I discovered recently.
> In my case, a ipv6 host route dissapeared 10 minutes after
> a PMTU event. As a result, this host was not reachable
> anymore.
>
> This happens because we don't clone host routes before
> we use them. If a PMTU event happens, the original route
> is marked with an expire value. After the expiration time
> is elapsed, the original route is deleted and we loose
> conectivity to the host.
>
> I'm currently testing patches to fix this. With these
> patches the ipv6 host routes are cloned if they are
> gateway routes, i.e. if PMTU events can happen.
>
> I fear it will not fix your case because PMTU events are
> not expected to happen at local fe80 routes.
I found current kernel will do ip6_update_pmtu() anyway after
receiving an ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG type packet in icmpv6_err().
Does it need some more condition ? Like this:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
index a5e95199585e..7c0a28add109 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -89,8 +89,10 @@ static void icmpv6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
/* icmpv6_notify checks 8 bytes can be pulled, icmp6hdr is 8 bytes */
struct icmp6hdr *icmp6 = (struct icmp6hdr *) (skb->data + offset);
struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
+ const struct ipv6hdr *iph = (struct ipv6hdr *) skb->data;
- if (type == ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG)
+ if (type == ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG &&
+ !(ipv6_addr_type(&iph->daddr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL))
ip6_update_pmtu(skb, net, info, 0, 0);
else if (type == NDISC_REDIRECT)
ip6_redirect(skb, net, skb->dev->ifindex, 0);
Regards,
Yang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-29 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-27 12:58 A problem about ICMP packet-too-big message handler Yang Yingliang
2015-01-28 5:19 ` Martin Lau
2015-01-28 6:46 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-01-28 12:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-29 1:04 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-01-28 8:42 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-01-28 10:07 ` Yang Yingliang
2015-01-28 12:10 ` Steffen Klassert
2015-01-28 12:11 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] ipv6: Fix after pmtu events dissapearing host routes Steffen Klassert
2015-01-29 10:26 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-01-29 10:44 ` Steffen Klassert
2015-02-05 23:56 ` Martin Lau
2015-02-09 10:26 ` Steffen Klassert
2015-03-09 9:00 ` Steffen Klassert
2015-01-28 12:12 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] ipv6: Extend the route lookups to low priority metrics Steffen Klassert
2015-01-29 3:16 ` Yang Yingliang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54C9A600.9080004@huawei.com \
--to=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).