netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@fb.com>
To: shengyong <shengyong1@huawei.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <yangyingling@huawei.com>,
	<steffen.klassert@secunet.com>, <hannes@redhat.com>,
	<lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org>, Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>,
	<kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: Question: should local address be expired when updating PMTU?
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:52:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D01BEA.2070501@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CF3348.40207@huawei.com>

Hello Shengyong,

 > diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
 > index b2614b2..b80317a 100644
 > --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
 > +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
 > @@ -1136,6 +1136,9 @@ static void ip6_rt_update_pmtu(struct dst_entry 
*dst, struct sock *sk,
 >   {
 >          struct rt6_info *rt6 = (struct rt6_info*)dst;
 >
 > +       if (rt6->rt6i_flags & RTF_LOCAL)
 > +               return;
 > +
 >          dst_confirm(dst);
 >          if (mtu < dst_mtu(dst) && rt6->rt6i_dst.plen == 128) {
 >                  struct net *net = dev_net(dst->dev);
 >
 > So is this modification correct? Or how can we avoid such expiring?


FWIW, we encountered this problem with IPVS tunneling.  Here's a patch 
done by Calvin (cc'ed) that fixes my attempted fix for this.  We're not 
particularly proud of this...

At a high level, I don't think the RTF_LOCAL check was sufficient, but I 
didn't investigate deeply enough and hopefully Calvin can say why.

diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index f14d49b..c607a42 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -1159,18 +1159,18 @@ static void ip6_rt_update_pmtu(struct dst_entry 
*dst, struct sock *sk,
                 }
                 dst_metric_set(dst, RTAX_MTU, mtu);

-               /* FACEBOOK HACK: We need to not expire local non-expiring
-                * routes so that we don't accidentally start blackholing
-                * ipvs traffic when we happen to use it locally for
-                * healthchecking (see ip_vs_xmit.c --
-                * __ip_vs_get_out_rt_v6 invokes update_pmtu if the rt is
-                * associated with a socket)
-                * Alex Gartrell <agartrell@fb.com>
+               /*
+                * FACEBOOK HACK: Only expire routes that aren't 
destined for
+                * the loopback interface.
+                *
+                * This prevents the strange route coalescing that 
happens when
+                * you add an address to the loopback that had a route 
that had
+                * been used when the address didn't exist from getting 
expired
+                * and causing packet loss in shiv.
                  */
-               if (!(rt6->rt6i_flags & RTF_LOCAL) ||
-                   (rt6->rt6i_flags & (RTF_EXPIRES | RTF_CACHE)))
-                       rt6_update_expires(
-                               rt6, net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_mtu_expires);
+               if (!(dst->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK))
+                       rt6_update_expires(rt6,
+ 
net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_mtu_expires);
         }
  }


Cheers,
-- 
Alex Gartrell <agartrell@fb.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-03  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-02  8:20 Question: should local address be expired when updating PMTU? shengyong
2015-02-02 21:31 ` David Miller
2015-02-03  0:52 ` Alex Gartrell [this message]
2015-02-03  1:28   ` shengyong
2015-02-03  2:10   ` Calvin Owens
2015-02-03  3:21     ` shengyong
2015-02-03  9:28 ` Steffen Klassert
2015-02-03 10:54   ` shengyong
2015-02-03 12:01     ` Steffen Klassert
2015-02-04  1:59       ` shengyong
2015-02-05  7:21         ` Steffen Klassert
2015-02-27  2:37           ` shengyong
2015-02-27 10:32             ` Steffen Klassert
2015-03-30 10:32             ` Steffen Klassert
2015-03-30 10:33               ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] ipv6: Fix after pmtu events dissapearing host routes Steffen Klassert
2015-03-30 11:15                 ` Sheng Yong
2015-03-30 18:24                 ` Martin Lau
2015-04-01  8:09                   ` Steffen Klassert
2015-03-30 10:33               ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] ipv6: Extend the route lookups to low priority metrics Steffen Klassert
2015-03-30 10:34               ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] ipv6: Don't update pmtu on uncached routes Steffen Klassert
2015-03-30 11:13               ` Question: should local address be expired when updating PMTU? Sheng Yong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D01BEA.2070501@fb.com \
    --to=agartrell@fb.com \
    --cc=calvinowens@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hannes@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shengyong1@huawei.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=yangyingling@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).