From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: [PATCHv3, ipsec-next] xfrm: Do not parse 32bits compiled xfrm netlink msg on 64bits host Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:02:07 +0100 Message-ID: <54D0D4DF.7080906@6wind.com> References: <1422349230-17394-1-git-send-email-fan.du@intel.com> <54CA0B9F.8080104@6wind.com> <20150202084443.GS13046@secunet.com> <54CF3D3A.5040607@6wind.com> <20150203122432.GV13046@secunet.com> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Fan Du , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, fengyuleidian0615@gmail.com To: Steffen Klassert Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]:44932 "EHLO mail-we0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753210AbbBCOCM (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:02:12 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p10so45207782wes.6 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:02:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150203122432.GV13046@secunet.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 03/02/2015 13:24, Steffen Klassert a =E9crit : > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:02:50AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > > I tend to apply this patch unless you can come up with a real world > application that will break if we do so. It's a custom patch made for strongswan (not included upstream). My suggestion was to display an error message instead of rejecting the = message. But fair enough, let's apply this patch, it will force people to come u= p with a proper solution.