netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: udp v6 early demux?
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:53:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54DAC43C.2090101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423589555.28434.36.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

On 02/10/2015 12:32 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 12:14 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> While testing udpv6 lockless path, I noticed that there is no
>> support for udpv6 early demux?  Is there a technical reason why,
>> or was this just something that got forgotten (kind of like
>> lockeless sendmsg)?
> 
> If you have a use case for connected UDP ipv6 flows with performance
> issues, then you might add early demux I guess.
> 
> IPv4 udp early demux has been a bit of a hack actually,
> as Shawn main usage was multicast AFAIK
> 
> 63c6f81cdde5 udp: ipv4: do not waste time in __udp4_lib_mcast_demux_lookup
> 610438b74496 udp: ipv4: fix potential use after free in udp_v4_early_demux()
> f69b923a758f udp: fix a typo in __udp4_lib_mcast_demux_lookup
> 421b3885bf6d udp: ipv4: Add udp early demux
> 
> 

I was more wondering if we can avoid the route the lookup.  It may not always be
a connected a case.  If you have multiple senders and a single receiver on the
same subnet, avoiding the route lookup with early demux might help.

-vlad

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-11  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-10 17:14 udp v6 early demux? Vlad Yasevich
2015-02-10 17:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-02-11  2:53   ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2015-02-11  4:57     ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54DAC43C.2090101@gmail.com \
    --to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).