From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yzhu1 Subject: Re: If bridge have no sub-interfaces, it's status may be still with 'RUNNING' Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:00:23 +0800 Message-ID: <54DDCB37.60603@windriver.com> References: <54DDCA99.4040401@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev , "Wu, Kuaikuai" , "Tao, Yue" , "stephen@networkplumber.org >> Stephen Hemminger" Return-path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]:38792 "EHLO mail1.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752068AbbBMKAU (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:00:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54DDCA99.4040401@windriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Add the maintainer of bridge. Any reply is appreciated. Zhu Yanjun On 02/13/2015 05:57 PM, yzhu1 wrote: > Hi, all > > I made this test on ubuntu 14.04 with kernel 3,19-rc7: > > 1. brctl addbr br0 > > 2. ifconfig br0 up > > 3. ifconfig br0 (br0's status is with 'RUNNING') > > 4. brctl addif br0 eth0 > > 5. brctl delif br0 eth0 > > 6. ifconfig br0 (br0's status is without 'RUNNING') > > When there is no sub-interface, the flag "RUNNING" is missing after > the last sub-interface is removed. > > As such, should we keep "RUNNING" flag after the last sub-interface is > removed? > > Thanks a lot. > Zhu Yanjun > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >