From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: Fix verification of EEE support in phy_init_eee
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:01:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54E4E19F.2080209@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424194582-9792-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
On 17/02/15 09:36, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> phy_init_eee uses phy_find_setting(phydev->speed, phydev->duplex)
> to find a valid entry in the settings array for the given speed
> and duplex value. For full duplex 1000baseT, this will return
> the first matching entry, which is the entry for 1000baseKX_Full.
>
> If the phy eee does not support 1000baseKX_Full, this entry will not
> match, causing phy_init_eee to fail for no good reason.
>
> Fixes: 9a9c56cb34e6 ("net: phy: fix a bug when verify the EEE support")
> Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Fixes: 3e7077067e80c ("phy: Expand phy speed/duplex settings array")
> ---
> I have another version where phy_check_valid() is open coded. It looks a bit
> messy to me, but I don't really mind either way if that is preferred.
>
> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> index cdcac6a..52cd8db 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,25 @@ static inline unsigned int phy_find_valid(unsigned int idx, u32 features)
> }
>
> /**
> + * phy_check_valid - check if there is a valid PHY setting which matches
> + * speed, duplex, and feature mask
> + * @speed: speed to match
> + * @duplex: duplex to match
> + * @features: A mask of the valid settings
> + *
> + * Description: Returns true if there is a valid setting, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool phy_check_valid(int speed, int duplex, u32 features)
> +{
> + unsigned int idx;
> +
> + idx = phy_find_valid(phy_find_setting(speed, duplex), features);
> +
> + return settings[idx].speed == speed && settings[idx].duplex == duplex &&
> + (settings[idx].setting & features);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * phy_sanitize_settings - make sure the PHY is set to supported speed and duplex
> * @phydev: the target phy_device struct
> *
> @@ -1045,7 +1064,6 @@ int phy_init_eee(struct phy_device *phydev, bool clk_stop_enable)
> int eee_lp, eee_cap, eee_adv;
> u32 lp, cap, adv;
> int status;
> - unsigned int idx;
>
> /* Read phy status to properly get the right settings */
> status = phy_read_status(phydev);
> @@ -1077,8 +1095,7 @@ int phy_init_eee(struct phy_device *phydev, bool clk_stop_enable)
>
> adv = mmd_eee_adv_to_ethtool_adv_t(eee_adv);
> lp = mmd_eee_adv_to_ethtool_adv_t(eee_lp);
> - idx = phy_find_setting(phydev->speed, phydev->duplex);
> - if (!(lp & adv & settings[idx].setting))
> + if (!phy_check_valid(phydev->speed, phydev->duplex, lp & adv))
> goto eee_exit_err;
>
> if (clk_stop_enable) {
>
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-18 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-17 17:36 [PATCH] net: phy: Fix verification of EEE support in phy_init_eee Guenter Roeck
2015-02-18 19:01 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-02-20 20:30 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54E4E19F.2080209@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).