From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Duyck Subject: Re: I can tell no FIB Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:01:45 -0800 Message-ID: <54F8D249.4080404@gmail.com> References: <54F8C802.1010706@gmail.com> <20150305.162711.545663291988773902.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sfeldma@gmail.com, alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:42168 "EHLO mail-pa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750834AbbCEWBr (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 17:01:47 -0500 Received: by padfa1 with SMTP id fa1so45861862pad.9 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:01:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150305.162711.545663291988773902.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/05/2015 01:27 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexander Duyck > Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:17:54 -0800 > >> On 03/05/2015 12:49 PM, Scott Feldman wrote: >>> Hi Alex, turns out you're required to take a mandatory week-long >>> vacation after your fourth patch set to net/ipv4/fib_*. See you in a >>> week! Take lots of pictures. >>> >>> -scott >> Well I have one more set of 9 and then I will stop for a while. I was >> planning to send it later tonight. Then I can probably take that >> week-long vacation.. >> >> I'm going to drop the portion of the patches I had where I was >> up-levelling the key vector since I still don't have a solution for the >> extra costs of insertion/deletion from the trie. Also I don't think it >> would work well with the merge of the main and local tries if that is >> the route we are planning to take. > Ok, where do you want to place the main/local tree patch then? > > Scott's L3 work logically depends upon that, and actually I think > Scott is sending you on vacation so that he doesn't have to rebase so > much :-) Yeah, I kind of figured that might be the case. If needed I can hold off for a day or so while Scott gets the FIB offloading stuff in and I could just submit the remaining 9 plus the main/local merge patch as an RFC so that it can be reviewed while the offload stuff is accepted. - Alex