From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] mv88e6131: bonding: implement single device trunking Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:06:50 -0800 Message-ID: <54F9DEAA.50606@gmail.com> References: <1424429473-4601-1-git-send-email-jonasj76@gmail.com> <1424429473-4601-3-git-send-email-jonasj76@gmail.com> <20150220152644.GD13797@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jonas Johansson , Jiri Pirko , Scott Feldman To: Andrew Lunn , Jonas Johansson Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:41820 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752316AbbCFRHT (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:07:19 -0500 Received: by pdjy10 with SMTP id y10so6691139pdj.8 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:07:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150220152644.GD13797@lunn.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 20/02/15 07:26, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:51:13AM +0100, Jonas Johansson wrote: > > Please could you look at all your functions and see what is specific > to the 6131 and what is generic. Place the generic code into mv88e6xxx > please so we can all use it. Out of curiosity, how many bonding/trunking groups are supported on the switches models currently in tree? Let's say there is a limitation: like no more than 2 different bonding groups on a given physical switch, where would we put this limitation, down to the switch driver? -- Florian