From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: roopa Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] route: label externally offloaded routes Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 07:14:14 -0700 Message-ID: <54FC5936.5010100@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <1425795335-6416-1-git-send-email-sfeldma@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, jiri@resnulli.us To: sfeldma@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:44800 "EHLO mail-pd0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751414AbbCHOOQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:14:16 -0400 Received: by pdjz10 with SMTP id z10so37428097pdj.11 for ; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 07:14:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1425795335-6416-1-git-send-email-sfeldma@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 3/7/15, 10:15 PM, sfeldma@gmail.com wrote: > From: Scott Feldman > > On ip route print dump, label externally offloaded routes with "external". > Offloaded routes are flagged with RTNH_F_EXTERNAL, a recent additon to > net-next. For example: > > $ ip route > default via 192.168.0.2 dev eth0 > 11.0.0.0/30 dev swp1 proto kernel scope link src 11.0.0.2 external > 11.0.0.4/30 via 11.0.0.1 dev swp1 proto zebra metric 20 external > 11.0.0.8/30 dev swp2 proto kernel scope link src 11.0.0.10 external > 11.0.0.12/30 via 11.0.0.9 dev swp2 proto zebra metric 20 external > 12.0.0.2 proto zebra metric 30 external > nexthop via 11.0.0.1 dev swp1 weight 1 > nexthop via 11.0.0.9 dev swp2 weight 1 > 12.0.0.3 via 11.0.0.1 dev swp1 proto zebra metric 20 external > 12.0.0.4 via 11.0.0.9 dev swp2 proto zebra metric 20 external > 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.15 > > Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman No objections to the patch. since this is now getting exposed to userspace and there were suggestions in the past to use words like 'hw' or 'offload' in place of 'external' here, checking to see if you are taking suggestions. If yes, would 'hw' or 'offloaded' be a better name for the flag ?. Given that this will come up again for acls and such. Thanks, Roopa