From: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] virtio-net: don't schedule delayed refill worker
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2026 11:33:20 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54e15e32-ee0d-4677-a85d-eb54ffe60a77@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260103115424-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 1/3/26 23:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 10:20:21PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
>> When we fail to refill the receive buffers, we schedule a delayed worker
>> to retry later. However, this worker creates some concurrency issues
>> such as races and deadlocks. To simplify the logic and avoid further
>> problems, we will instead retry refilling in the next NAPI poll.
>>
>> Fixes: 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill when pausing rx")
>> Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>> Closes: https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/drv-hw-dbg/results/400961/3-xdp-py/stderr
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Suggested-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 1bb3aeca66c6..ac514c9383ae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -3035,7 +3035,7 @@ static int virtnet_receive_packets(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>> }
>>
>> static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
>> - unsigned int *xdp_xmit)
>> + unsigned int *xdp_xmit, bool *retry_refill)
>> {
>> struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>> struct virtnet_rq_stats stats = {};
>> @@ -3047,12 +3047,8 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
>> packets = virtnet_receive_packets(vi, rq, budget, xdp_xmit, &stats);
>>
>> if (rq->vq->num_free > min((unsigned int)budget, virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq)) / 2) {
>> - if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
>> - spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
>> - if (vi->refill_enabled)
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> - spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
>> - }
>> + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
>> + *retry_refill = true;
>> }
>>
>> u64_stats_set(&stats.packets, packets);
>> @@ -3129,18 +3125,18 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>> struct send_queue *sq;
>> unsigned int received;
>> unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0;
>> - bool napi_complete;
>> + bool napi_complete, retry_refill = false;
>>
>> virtnet_poll_cleantx(rq, budget);
>>
>> - received = virtnet_receive(rq, budget, &xdp_xmit);
>> + received = virtnet_receive(rq, budget, &xdp_xmit, &retry_refill);
>> rq->packets_in_napi += received;
>>
>> if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_REDIR)
>> xdp_do_flush();
>>
>> /* Out of packets? */
>> - if (received < budget) {
>> + if (received < budget && !retry_refill) {
>> napi_complete = virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, rq->vq, received);
>> /* Intentionally not taking dim_lock here. This may result in a
>> * spurious net_dim call. But if that happens virtnet_rx_dim_work
>> @@ -3160,7 +3156,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>> virtnet_xdp_put_sq(vi, sq);
>> }
>>
>> - return received;
>> + return retry_refill ? budget : received;
>> }
>>
>> static void virtnet_disable_queue_pair(struct virtnet_info *vi, int qp_index)
>> @@ -3230,9 +3226,11 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>> - /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
>> - if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> + /* If this fails, we will retry later in
>> + * NAPI poll, which is scheduled in the below
>> + * virtnet_enable_queue_pair
> hmm do we even need this, then?
>
>> + */
>> + try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>> if (err < 0)
>> @@ -3473,15 +3471,15 @@ static void __virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>> bool refill)
>> {
>> bool running = netif_running(vi->dev);
>> - bool schedule_refill = false;
>>
>> - if (refill && !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL))
>> - schedule_refill = true;
>> + if (refill)
>> + /* If this fails, we will retry later in NAPI poll, which is
>> + * scheduled in the below virtnet_napi_enable
>> + */
>> + try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> hmm do we even need this, then?
>
>> +
>> if (running)
>> virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
>> -
>> - if (schedule_refill)
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> }
>>
>> static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> @@ -3777,6 +3775,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
>> struct virtio_net_rss_config_trailer old_rss_trailer;
>> struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>> struct scatterlist sg;
>> + int i;
>>
>> if (!vi->has_cvq || !virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ))
>> return 0;
>> @@ -3829,11 +3828,17 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
>> }
>> succ:
>> vi->curr_queue_pairs = queue_pairs;
>> - /* virtnet_open() will refill when device is going to up. */
>> - spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> - if (dev->flags & IFF_UP && vi->refill_enabled)
>> - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> - spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> + if (dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
>> + /* Let the NAPI poll refill the receive buffer for us. We can't
>> + * safely call try_fill_recv() here because the NAPI might be
>> + * enabled already.
>> + */
> I'd drop this comment, it does not clarify much.
Here I want to note on why we can't use try_fill_recv like in other places.
>
>> + local_bh_disable();
>> + for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++)
>> + virtqueue_napi_schedule(&vi->rq[i].napi, vi->rq[i].vq);
>> +
>> + local_bh_enable();
>> + }
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-04 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-02 15:20 [PATCH net v2 0/3] virtio-net: fix the deadlock when disabling rx NAPI Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] virtio-net: don't schedule delayed refill worker Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-03 0:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-03 16:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-03 17:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-04 4:33 ` Bui Quang Minh [this message]
2026-01-04 13:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-04 6:09 ` Jason Wang
2026-01-04 8:34 ` Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-04 14:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-04 14:54 ` Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-04 15:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-05 15:03 ` Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-05 20:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-04 13:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] virtio-net: remove unused " Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-03 9:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-01-02 15:20 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] virtio-net: clean up __virtnet_rx_pause/resume Bui Quang Minh
2026-01-03 9:13 ` [PATCH net v2 0/3] virtio-net: fix the deadlock when disabling rx NAPI Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54e15e32-ee0d-4677-a85d-eb54ffe60a77@gmail.com \
--to=minhquangbui99@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).