From: Pat Erley <pat-lkml@erley.org>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Bj??rn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 RFC] ath10k: move code out of the parameter list
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:41:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55007E35.4010804@erley.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426094369-10213-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>
On 03/11/2015 12:19 PM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> Putting code into the parameter list of wait_event_timeout() might be
> legal C-code but not really readable - the "inline" code is simply
> moved into a function and that passed to wait_event_timeout() as the
> condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
> ---
>
> Thanks to Bjorn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> for clarifying my initial confusion !
>
> Patch was only compile tested with x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_ATH_CARDS=m,
> CONFIG_ATH10K=m
>
> Patch is against 4.0-rc3 (localversion-next is -next-20150311)
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
> index e8cc19f..7b27d99 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
> @@ -4463,11 +4463,25 @@ static int ath10k_set_rts_threshold(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 value)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static bool check_htt_state(struct ath10k *ar, bool skip)
> +{
> + bool empty;
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&ar->htt.tx_lock);
> + empty = (ar->htt.num_pending_tx == 0);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ar->htt.tx_lock);
> +
> + skip = (ar->state == ATH10K_STATE_WEDGED) ||
> + test_bit(ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH,
> + &ar->dev_flags);
> + return (empty || skip);
> +}
> +
> static void ath10k_flush(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> u32 queues, bool drop)
> {
> struct ath10k *ar = hw->priv;
> - bool skip;
> + bool skip = false;
> int ret;
>
> /* mac80211 doesn't care if we really xmit queued frames or not
> @@ -4480,19 +4494,9 @@ static void ath10k_flush(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> if (ar->state == ATH10K_STATE_WEDGED)
> goto skip;
>
> - ret = wait_event_timeout(ar->htt.empty_tx_wq, ({
> - bool empty;
> -
> - spin_lock_bh(&ar->htt.tx_lock);
> - empty = (ar->htt.num_pending_tx == 0);
> - spin_unlock_bh(&ar->htt.tx_lock);
> -
> - skip = (ar->state == ATH10K_STATE_WEDGED) ||
> - test_bit(ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH,
> - &ar->dev_flags);
> -
> - (empty || skip);
> - }), ATH10K_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_HZ);
> + ret = wait_event_timeout(ar->htt.empty_tx_wq,
> + check_htt_state(ar, skip),
> + ATH10K_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_HZ);
>
> if (ret <= 0 || skip)
> ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to flush transmit queue (skip %i ar-state %i): %i\n",
>
Doesn't this change not assign to 'skip' in the calling function? So
you'd want to make it:
static bool check_htt_state(struct ath10k *ar, bool *skip)
{
bool empty;
spin_lock_bh(&ar->htt.tx_lock);
empty = (ar->htt.num_pending_tx == 0);
spin_unlock_bh(&ar->htt.tx_lock);
*skip = (ar->state == ATH10K_STATE_WEDGED) ||
test_bit(ATH10K_FLAG_CRASH_FLUSH,
&ar->dev_flags);
return (empty || *skip);
}
ret = wait_event_timeout(ar->htt.empty_tx_wq,
check_htt_state(ar, &skip),
ATH10K_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_HZ);
To preserve the previous behavior?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-11 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-11 17:19 [PATCH 1/2 RFC] ath10k: move code out of the parameter list Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-03-11 17:41 ` Pat Erley [this message]
2015-03-11 18:13 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-03-11 18:09 ` Bjørn Mork
2015-03-11 18:26 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55007E35.4010804@erley.org \
--to=pat-lkml@erley.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).