netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for overlapping CAN filters
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:14:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55198485.5070107@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5519708E.3040002@hartkopp.net>

Hello.

On 03/30/2015 06:49 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:

>>> +    /* eliminate multiple filter matches for the same skb */
>>> +    if (*this_cpu_ptr(ro->uniq_skb) == oskb &&
>>> +        ktime_equal(*this_cpu_ptr(ro->uniq_tstamp), oskb->tstamp)) {
>>> +            return;

>>     Over-indented.

> I was asked about that before. AFAIK the *skb is no unique identifier over a
> longer period of time. But together with the timestamp it becomes unique.
> Or do you have a better solution to detect identical skbs?

    I just said that *return* was too far to the right, that's all. :-)

> CAN skbs do not have a (rx)hash so far and I wonder if it's worth to compute
> the hash in favor to check the *skb and the timestamp here ...

[...]

> Best regards,
> Oliver

WBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-30 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-29 18:09 [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] can: join filters with per-CPU variables Oliver Hartkopp
2015-03-29 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for overlapping CAN filters Oliver Hartkopp
2015-03-30  9:50   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-03-30 10:29     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-03-30 10:36       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-03-30 10:10   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-03-30 10:16     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-03-30 10:41     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-03-31 12:32       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-03-31 20:24         ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-03-30 12:33   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-03-30 15:49     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-03-30 17:14       ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2015-03-30 17:25         ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-03-29 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/2] can: introduce new raw socket option to join the given " Oliver Hartkopp
2015-03-31 12:36   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-03-31 20:30     ` Oliver Hartkopp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55198485.5070107@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).