From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: TSO on veth device slows transmission to a crawl Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 11:19:02 -0700 Message-ID: <55257116.30300@hp.com> References: <1428374918.25985.206.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <1428436189.25985.211.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <5525634A.10207@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , Linux Networking Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from g4t3427.houston.hp.com ([15.201.208.55]:57713 "EHLO g4t3427.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754174AbbDHSTF (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:19:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/08/2015 11:16 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > One more thing to be aware of is that iptraf counts all the > headers, which netperf likely is not doing. > > -m 1: iptraf 57 MBit/s, netperf 0.69*10^6 > -m 10: iptraf 63 MBit/s, netperf 6.76*10^6 > -m 100: iptraf 114 MBit/s, netperf 75.74*10^6 > : iptraf~580 MBit/s, netperf 542.00*10^6 Indeed, netperf makes no attempt to count headers. What it reports is strictly above the socket interface. rick