From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] slab: add private memory allocator header for arch/lib Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:44:35 +0200 Message-ID: <55310033.1060108@nod.at> References: <1427202642-1716-1-git-send-email-tazaki@sfc.wide.ad.jp> <1429263374-57517-1-git-send-email-tazaki@sfc.wide.ad.jp> <1429263374-57517-3-git-send-email-tazaki@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Jekka Enberg , Javid Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Jndrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Jeff Dike , Rusty Russell , Ryo Nakamura , Christoph Paasch , Mathieu Lacage , libos-nuse@googlegroups.com To: Christoph Lameter , Hajime Tazaki Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Am 17.04.2015 um 14:17 schrieb Christoph Lameter: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > >> add header includion for CONFIG_LIB to wrap kmalloc and co. This will >> bring malloc(3) based allocator used by arch/lib. > > Maybe add another allocator insteadl? SLLB which implements memory > management using malloc()? Yeah, that's a good idea. Hajime, another question, do you really want a malloc/free backend? I'm not a mm expert, but does malloc() behave exactly as the kernel counter parts? In UML we allocate a big file on the host side, mmap() it and give this mapping to the kernel as physical memory such that any kernel allocator can work with it. Thanks, //richard