From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] tc: deprecate TC_ACT_QUEUED Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:13:36 +0200 Message-ID: <55389BA0.2030801@iogearbox.net> References: <1429644476-8914-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <1429644476-8914-3-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <55381F14.4070708@plumgrid.com> <55385D0B.5030103@plumgrid.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jamal Hadi Salim , John Fastabend , netdev To: Alexei Starovoitov , Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:46697 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750822AbbDWHNu (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 03:13:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55385D0B.5030103@plumgrid.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/23/2015 04:46 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: ... > The other two threads degenerated into non-technical comments. Yep. :-/ > Anyway, this set was RFC to answer my main question whether I should > continue with tc cleanup or stop right here. I got my answer. I think it's worth proceeding with this, it's long overdue.