From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mdio-gpio: support access that may sleep
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:19:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553A6D2B.20901@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150424.120142.515098054679955418.davem@davemloft.net>
On 24/04/15 09:01, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:56:34 -0700
>
>> On 24/04/15 08:04, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:06:54 -0400
>>>
>>>> Some systems using mdio-gpio may use gpio on message based busses, which
>>>> require sleeping (e.g. gpio from an I2C I/O expander).
>>>>
>>>> Since this driver does not use IRQ handler, it is safe to use the
>>>> _cansleep suffixed gpio accessors.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
>>>
>>> Since this is down underneath the layer of an MII bus, you cannot
>>> universally say that these routines are always called in a sleepable
>>> context.
>>>
>>> The PHY layer, and the driver itself above that, might call these
>>> routines from timers, interruptes etc.
>>
>> The PHY library calls these routines from its state machine workqueue
>> for that reason, or from process context (when invoked via ethtool
>> ioctl). The only special case is phy_mac_interrupt() which is callable
>> from interrupt context, but schedules the state machine workqueue anyway
>> to circumvent the "in-interrupt" context.
>>
>> If we were not doing that, there would be a number of things broken, for
>> instance the per-MDIO bus mutex would not protect us from anything.
>
> Does the link state polling timer use a workqueue in this manner as
> well?
Yes, the state machine re-schedules its own delayed workqueue at the end
of its state processing, no timer/hrtimer is used.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-24 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 17:06 [PATCH] net: mdio-gpio: support access that may sleep Vivien Didelot
2015-04-24 15:04 ` David Miller
2015-04-24 15:56 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-24 16:01 ` David Miller
2015-04-24 16:19 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-04-24 16:25 ` David Miller
2015-04-24 17:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-04-24 17:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-24 17:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553A6D2B.20901@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).