From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com,
jerome.oufella@savoirfairelinux.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
cphealy@gmail.com, mathieu@codeaurora.org, jonasj76@gmail.com,
andrey.volkov@nexvision.fr, Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: New registration API
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:50:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55425D5C.1020101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430131216.GC22831@lunn.ch>
On 30/04/15 06:12, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Note that there are currenlty no incompatibles changes made to existing Device
>> Tree sources, rather, depending on the bus we are probed for, e.g: MDIO
>> the dsa,mii-bus and dsa,ethernet phandles and first cell of the "reg" property
>> will become obsolete, everything else remains entirely compatible.
>
> Hi Florian
>
> I'm not sure dsa,mii-bus and dsa,ethernet will become obsolete. At
> least they are probably needed for multi switch setups, and the
> possible but probably unlikely multi DSA setups.
>
> You cannot assume that dsa,mii-bus and dsa,ethernet have the same
> parent. In a multi switch setup, it could be there is an mdio-mux in
> the picture. So all your probe really tells you, is that there is a
> switch on this mii bus, but you don't know what ethernet it is hanging
> off.
Good point.
>
> The switch could be hanging off multiple ethernets. I'm working on
> supporting this for the WRT1900AC, where i use the bond driver on the
> host side. So dsa,ethernet is a phandle to a bond interface.
Humm, bond is a software constructs, don't you rather want two phandles
to the relevant Ethernet interfaces instead and then learn through
netlink/netdevice notifiers that these are eventually part of the same bond?
>
> The probe is likely to find all switches in a multi switch setup. But
> i guess we only want the probe of the root devices in a switch tree to
> cause a DSA setup.
Right.
>
> So i think there needs to be some matching performed when looking in
> the device tree. The dsa,mii-bus and address discovered by probing
> need to match what is in the DSA properties.
Sure, that's a good point. I tried to start with simple case first, if
you can recommend consumer/off the shelf hardware which has a cascaded
setup, that could help too.
The configuration I have access to with Broadcom switches looks like
this: internal SF2 switch MMIO-mapped, with an external RGMII interface
to a MDIO connected BCM53125 switch.
so this not a true switch tree here, they can (and should) be treated as
different switch trees, attached to different interfaces: eth0 for CPU
for the internal one and the DSA-created "rgmii" interface for the
second switch.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 1:57 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: New registration API Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/8] net: dsa: Move dsa_switch_tree final setup in separate function Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:01 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/8] net: phy: Check fixup lists in get_phy_device() Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:02 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/8] net: phy: Allow PHY devices to identify themselves as Ethernet switches Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 12:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 16:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 17:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 17:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 18:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 18:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/8] net: mv643xx_eth: Handle Ethernet switches as PHY devices Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:06 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/8] net: dsa: add new API to register switch devices Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:09 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/8] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: make it a real platform driver Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 7/8] net: dsa: mv88e6060: make it a proper PHY driver Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 12:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 13:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-30 16:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 17:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 17:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-01 2:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 6:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 8/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Allow them to be proper PHY drivers Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 13:12 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: New registration API Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 16:50 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-04-30 17:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 17:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 18:14 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55425D5C.1020101@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrey.volkov@nexvision.fr \
--cc=cphealy@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jerome.oufella@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=jonasj76@gmail.com \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mathieu@codeaurora.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).