From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com,
jerome.oufella@savoirfairelinux.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
cphealy@gmail.com, mathieu@codeaurora.org, jonasj76@gmail.com,
andrey.volkov@nexvision.fr, Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/8] net: phy: Allow PHY devices to identify themselves as Ethernet switches
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:37:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55426868.8020606@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430171630.GE18874@lunn.ch>
On 30/04/15 10:16, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Hi Florian
>>>
>>> I have another two use cases for fixed_phy which i'm thinking about
>>> implementing soon. Both require putting a fixed_phy into DSA port
>>> properties in DT.
>>>
>>> The first is when the CPU ethernet and the switch don't have the same
>>> speed capabilities. At the moment, the switch driver configures the
>>> CPU port to its maximum speed. But i know of a board coming soon with
>>> gigabit switch ports, but the CPU Ethernet is only fast Ethernet.
>>
>> With the patch after, if your switch is MDIO connected to your host, you
>> could make that happen easily, since the read_status() callback would
>> only be invoked for the CPU port from the CPU Ethernet MAC driver
>> (that's the theory).
>
> I'm not sure i get what you are saying.
>
> What we currently have is:
>
> CPU ETH->fixed_phy Switch port CPU
> | |
> +---------------------------------------+
>
> and what i'm thinking we want is:
>
> CPU ETH->fixed_phy fixed_phy <-Switch port CPU
> | |
> +---------------------------------------+
>
> So that when setting up the switch side of the link, i can read from
> the switch ports fixed_phy how the port should be configured.
I see, but it still seems to me like these fixed PHY devices could be
eliminated completely only, and only if your switch is MDIO connected,
because then this becomes this:
CPU ETH -> PHY driver <- CPU port of the switch
and the PHY driver provided by your switch gives you the correct link
parameters for both ends, right?
If you do not have a MDIO switch, or something we could discover the
link parameters from, then a fixed PHY has to be used, and it seems to
me like we should have some sort of generic code doing that in DSA
today: try to find a 'fixed-link' subnode (or old 5-tuple property) in
the device tree node pointed at by dsa,ethernet, read these and feed
them back to the DSA switch driver such that link parameters can be
properly configured?
Feels like whatever we decide there is definitively something missing
today though, either the Ethernet MAC does not have the hooks to get the
parameters, or the switch has hardcoded them...
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 1:57 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: New registration API Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/8] net: dsa: Move dsa_switch_tree final setup in separate function Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:01 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/8] net: phy: Check fixup lists in get_phy_device() Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:02 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/8] net: phy: Allow PHY devices to identify themselves as Ethernet switches Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 12:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 16:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 17:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-04-30 17:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 18:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 18:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/8] net: mv643xx_eth: Handle Ethernet switches as PHY devices Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:06 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/8] net: dsa: add new API to register switch devices Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:09 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/8] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: make it a real platform driver Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 7/8] net: dsa: mv88e6060: make it a proper PHY driver Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 12:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 13:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-30 16:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 17:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 17:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-01 2:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 6:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 8/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Allow them to be proper PHY drivers Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 13:12 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: New registration API Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 16:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 17:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 17:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 18:14 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55426868.8020606@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrey.volkov@nexvision.fr \
--cc=cphealy@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jerome.oufella@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=jonasj76@gmail.com \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mathieu@codeaurora.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).