Re: [PATCH net] bonding: alb: re-check primary_is_promisc under RTNL in bond_alb_monitor

[Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>]

On 21/07/2026 01:34, Xiang Mei (Microsoft) wrote:
> bond_alb_monitor() reads primary_is_promisc under RCU, then drops RCU and
> takes RTNL via rtnl_trylock() before undoing the promiscuity it set on the
> active slave. In that window the active slave can change under RTNL
> (RTM_DELLINK -> __bond_release_one() -> bond_alb_handle_active_change()),
> which already drops the promiscuity and clears primary_is_promisc. The
> monitor still acts on the stale decision: if the slave was removed with no
> failover, curr_active_slave is now NULL and the deref faults; if it failed
> over, the stale dev_set_promiscuity(-1) underflows the new slave's
> promiscuity counter and pins it in IFF_PROMISC.
> 
>    Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address ...
>    KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
>    Workqueue: b42 bond_alb_monitor
>    RIP: 0010:bond_alb_monitor (drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c:1600)
>     process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3322)
>     worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3486)
>     kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436)
>     ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158)
>    Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> 
> Re-check primary_is_promisc (and curr_active_slave) after taking RTNL so
> the monitor only undoes an increment it still owns. The other bonding
> monitors already re-read state under RTNL in their commit phase
> (bond_miimon_commit/bond_ab_arp_commit); bond_alb_monitor() was the only
> one acting on the pre-trylock decision.
> 
> Fixes: d0e81b7e2246 ("bonding: Acquire correct locks in alb for promisc change")
> Reported-by: AutonomousCodeSecurity@microsoft.com
> Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
> ---
>   drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 10 ++++++----
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> index 2d37b07c8215..70458c5b23cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> @@ -1535,7 +1535,7 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>   					    alb_work.work);
>   	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
>   	struct list_head *iter;
> -	struct slave *slave;
> +	struct slave *slave, *curr;

please move this up to keep the reverse xmas tree ordering

>   
>   	if (!bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
>   		atomic_set(&bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter, 0);
> @@ -1597,9 +1597,11 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>   			 * because a slave was disabled then
>   			 * it can now leave promiscuous mode.
>   			 */
> -			dev_set_promiscuity(rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave)->dev,
> -					    -1);
> -			bond_info->primary_is_promisc = 0;
> +			curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> +			if (bond_info->primary_is_promisc && curr) {
> +				dev_set_promiscuity(curr->dev, -1);
> +				bond_info->primary_is_promisc = 0;
> +			}
>   
>   			rtnl_unlock();
>   			rcu_read_lock();