netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, vyasevich@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jpirko@redhat.com, vfalico@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core: Correct an over-stringent device loop detection.
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 15:55:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5547CEC4.3060204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150504.145815.2274500932397440771.davem@davemloft.net>

On 05/04/2015 02:58 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat,  2 May 2015 21:33:44 -0400
> 
>> The code in __netdev_upper_dev_link() has an over-stringent
>> loop detection logic that actually prevents valid configurations
>> from working correctly.
>>
>> In particular, the logic returns an error if an upper device
>> is already in the list of all upper devices for a given dev.
>> This particular check seems to be a overzealous as it disallows
>> perfectly valid configurations.  For example:
>>   # ip l a link eth0 name eth0.10 type vlan id 10
>>   # ip l a dev br0 typ bridge
>>   # ip l s eth0.10 master br0
>>   # ip l s eth0 master br0  <--- Will fail
>>
>> If you switch the last two commands (add eth0 first), then both
>> will succeed.  If after that, you remove eth0 and try to re-add
>> it, it will fail!
>>
>> It appears to be enough to simply check adj_list to keeps things
>> safe.
>>
>> I've tried stacking multiple devices multiple times in all different
>> combinations, and either rx_handler registration prevented the stacking
>> of the device linking cought the error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
> 
> Applied, thanks Vlad.
> 

Hi Dave

Can you also queue it for stable.  This has been broken for a while.
Thanks
-vlad

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-03  1:33 [PATCH] core: Correct an over-stringent device loop detection Vladislav Yasevich
2015-05-03 17:46 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-05-03 18:07 ` Veaceslav Falico
2015-05-04 18:58 ` David Miller
2015-05-04 19:55   ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2015-05-04 20:22     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5547CEC4.3060204@redhat.com \
    --to=vyasevic@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).