From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Samudrala, Sridhar" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] switchdev: add support for fdb add/del/dump via switchdev_port_obj ops. Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:07:42 -0700 Message-ID: <555295CE.9090207@intel.com> References: <1430949253-6358-1-git-send-email-sridhar.samudrala@intel.com> <20150512.182013.447321071616691313.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sfeldma@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:23139 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964873AbbEMAHn (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 20:07:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150512.182013.447321071616691313.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 5/12/2015 3:20 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Sridhar Samudrala > Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 14:54:13 -0700 > >> - introduce port fdb obj and generic switchdev_port_fdb_add/del/dump() >> - use switchdev_port_fdb_add/del/dump in rocker/team/bonding ndo ops. >> - add support for fdb obj in switchdev_port_obj_add/del/dump() >> - switch rocker to implement fdb ops via switchdev_ops >> >> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala >> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman > What is this patch even against? I don't see switchdev_port_obj_add() > in any tree I maintain, yet this patch's context shows references to > it which should exist already. Sorry, I should have mentioned that this patch is on top of v5 version of Scott's switchdev spring cleanup patches. Now that v7 version is merged, i will resubmit on top of net-next. Thanks Sridhar