Re: [PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues in tunnels

[Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>]

On 05/27/2015 10:36 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> This change makes it so that we use icmpv6_send to report PMTU issues back
>> into tunnels in the case that the resulting packet is larger than the MTU
>> of the outgoing interface.  Previously xfrm_local_error was being used in
>> this case, however this was resulting in no changes, I suspect due to the
>> fact that the tunnel itself was being kept out of the loop.
>>
>> This patch fixes PMTU problems seen on ip6_vti tunnels and is based on the
>> behavior seen if the socket was orphaned.  Instead of requiring the socket
>> to be orphaned this patch simply defaults to using icmpv6_send in the case
>> that the frame came though a tunnel.
> We can use icmpv6_send() just in the case that the packet
> was already transmitted by a tunnel device, otherwise we
> get the bug back that I mentioned in my other mail.
>
> Not sure if we have something to know that the packet
> traversed a tunnel device. That's what I asked in the
> thread 'Looking for a lost patch'.

Okay I will try to do some more digging.  From what I can tell right now 
it looks like my ping attempts are getting hung up on the 
xfrm_local_error in __xfrm6_output.  I wonder if we couldn't somehow 
make use of the skb->cb to store a pointer to the tunnel that could be 
checked to determine if we are going through a VTI or not.

- Alex