From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@cumulusnetworks.com>,
hannes@stressinduktion.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
hadi@mojatatu.com, davem@davemloft.net,
stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, gospo@cumulusnetworks.com,
jtoppins@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/3] Proposal for VRF-lite
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 08:21:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5576F652.4090903@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5576AAD2.8010405@6wind.com>
Hi Nicolas:
On 6/9/15 2:58 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> I'm not really in favor of the name 'vrf'. This term is very
> controversial and
> having a consensus of what is/contains a 'vrf' is quite impossible.
> There was already a lot of discussions about this topic on quagga ml
> that show
> that everybody has a different opinion about this term ;-)
Are you referring to this thread?
https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2014-November/011795.html
I could see differing opinions regarding the implementation of a VRF; is
there really a controversy on what a VRF is?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-09 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 18:35 [RFC net-next 0/3] Proposal for VRF-lite Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-08 18:35 ` [RFC net-next 1/3] Symbol preparation for VRF driver Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-10 16:24 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-06-08 18:35 ` [RFC net-next 2/3] VRF driver and needed infrastructure Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-08 19:08 ` David Ahern
2015-06-08 20:17 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-06-09 9:19 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-06-09 12:35 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-06-10 2:11 ` Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-10 18:20 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-06-08 18:35 ` [RFC net-next 3/3] rcv path changes for vrf traffic Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-08 19:58 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-06-08 20:00 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-06-08 20:22 ` Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-08 20:33 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-06-08 22:44 ` Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-09 5:41 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-06-08 22:05 ` David Miller
2015-06-08 22:13 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-06-08 22:21 ` David Miller
2015-06-09 0:36 ` David Ahern
2015-06-09 1:03 ` David Ahern
2015-06-09 5:35 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-06-10 18:31 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-06-08 18:35 ` [RFC iproute2] Add the ability to create a VRF device and specify it's table binding Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-08 19:13 ` [RFC net-next 0/3] Proposal for VRF-lite David Ahern
2015-06-08 19:51 ` Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-08 20:41 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-06-09 8:58 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-06-09 14:21 ` David Ahern [this message]
2015-06-09 14:55 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-06-09 17:14 ` Shrijeet Mukherjee
2015-06-09 10:15 ` Thomas Graf
2015-06-09 12:30 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-06-09 12:43 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
[not found] ` <CAJmoNQHRTJwdMjziQiPBX07sZKrYd3Z1ASNi1xQZdgJ1Vs6bGg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-06-12 9:46 ` Thomas Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5576F652.4090903@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=hadi@mojatatu.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jtoppins@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=shm@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).