From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mleitner@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: allow authenticating DATA chunks that are bundled with COOKIE_ECHO
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:24:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557B15B8.6050500@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150612112640.GA22204@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
On 06/12/2015 07:26 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:27:45PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: mleitner@redhat.com
>> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:49:46 -0300
>>
>>> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, we can ask to authenticate DATA chunks and we can send DATA
>>> chunks on the same packet as COOKIE_ECHO, but if you try to combine
>>> both, the DATA chunk will be sent unauthenticated and peer won't accept
>>> it, leading to a communication failure.
>>>
>>> This happens because even though the data was queued after it was
>>> requested to authenticate DATA chunks, it was also queued before we
>>> could know that remote peer can handle authenticating, so
>>> sctp_auth_send_cid() returns false.
>>>
>>> The fix is whenever we set up an active key, re-check send queue for
>>> chunks that now should be authenticated. As a result, such packet will
>>> now contain COOKIE_ECHO + AUTH + DATA chunks, in that order.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Liu Wei <weliu@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
>>
>> Vlad/Neil, please review.
>>
>
> sorry Dave, though I had sent email on that already.
>
> I had an initial concern that there could be a race in which a previous
> iteration of sctp_outq_flush would move some chunks to a packet, but not flush
> it to the network layer yet (due to not being full), and that would result in
> the same condition. But since this only happens with a COOKIE_ECHO chunk (which
> is a control chunk), we should be ok, as those are sent immediately.
Neil. I don't think this race can happen since outq manipulation always happens under
a socket lock and so do socket options. So, we are guaranteed that outq will not change
in this case.
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
-vlad
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 17:49 [PATCH] sctp: allow authenticating DATA chunks that are bundled with COOKIE_ECHO mleitner
2015-06-12 0:27 ` David Miller
2015-06-12 11:26 ` Neil Horman
2015-06-12 17:24 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2015-06-12 21:18 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557B15B8.6050500@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).