From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Cory Tusar <cory.tusar@pid1solutions.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: dsa: Allow configuration of CPU & DSA port speeds/duplex
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:14:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557B2181.9090900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434129537-15252-3-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch>
On 12/06/15 10:18, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> By default, DSA and CPU ports are configured to the maximum speed the
> switch supports. However there can be use cases where the peer device
> port is slower. Allow a fixed-link property to be used with the DSA
> and CPU port in the device tree, and use this information to configure
> the port.
Humm, I suppose this means that we might end-up with two fixed PHY
devices, one for the Ethernet MAC, and another one for the switch? That
might duplicate the same information, though I cannot think of a better
solution than using phandles to resolve that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> ---
> include/net/dsa.h | 1 +
> net/dsa/dsa.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
> index fbca63ba8f73..24572f99224c 100644
> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ struct dsa_switch {
> * Slave mii_bus and devices for the individual ports.
> */
> u32 dsa_port_mask;
> + u32 cpu_port_mask;
> u32 phys_port_mask;
> u32 phys_mii_mask;
> struct mii_bus *slave_mii_bus;
> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> index 392e29a0227d..f9c8f4e7ebce 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,36 @@ __ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(dsa_hwmon);
> #endif /* CONFIG_NET_DSA_HWMON */
>
> /* basic switch operations **************************************************/
> +static int dsa_cpu_dsa_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct net_device *master)
> +{
> + struct dsa_chip_data *cd = ds->pd;
> + struct device_node *port_dn;
> + struct phy_device *phydev;
> + int ret, port;
> +
> + for (port = 0; port < DSA_MAX_PORTS; port++) {
> + if (!((ds->cpu_port_mask | ds->dsa_port_mask) & (1 << port)))
> + continue;
> +
> + port_dn = cd->port_dn[port];
> + if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(port_dn)) {
> + ret = of_phy_register_fixed_link(port_dn);
> + if (ret) {
> + netdev_err(master,
> + "failed to register fixed PHY\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + phydev = of_phy_find_device(port_dn);
> + phydev->is_pseudo_fixed_link = true;
> + genphy_config_init(phydev);
> + genphy_read_status(phydev);
I was curious as to why you were doing this at first, but I guess this
is because the PHY state machine is not started for this fixed PHY that
you just created, right?
> + if (ds->drv->adjust_link)
> + ds->drv->adjust_link(ds, port, phydev);
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int dsa_switch_setup_one(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device *parent)
> {
> struct dsa_switch_driver *drv = ds->drv;
> @@ -204,6 +234,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_setup_one(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device *parent)
> }
> dst->cpu_switch = index;
> dst->cpu_port = i;
> + ds->cpu_port_mask |= 1 << i;
Same question as Guenter here, I assume this is because you plan on
having multiple CPU ports connected to the switch and this makes it
easier to deal with, is that right?
> } else if (!strcmp(name, "dsa")) {
> ds->dsa_port_mask |= 1 << i;
> } else {
> @@ -297,6 +328,14 @@ static int dsa_switch_setup_one(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device *parent)
> }
> }
>
> + /* Perform configuration of the CPU and DSA ports */
> + ret = dsa_cpu_dsa_setup(ds, dst->master_netdev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + netdev_err(dst->master_netdev, "[%d] : can't configure CPU and DSA ports\n",
> + index);
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_DSA_HWMON
> /* If the switch provides a temperature sensor,
> * register with hardware monitoring subsystem.
>
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-12 17:18 [PATCH 1/3] net: phy: Allow PHY devices to identify themselves as Ethernet switches, etc Andrew Lunn
2015-06-12 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] dsa: mv88e6xxx: Allow speed/duplex of port to be configured Andrew Lunn
2015-06-12 17:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: dsa: Allow configuration of CPU & DSA port speeds/duplex Andrew Lunn
2015-06-12 18:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-06-12 18:14 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-06-12 18:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-06-15 17:32 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-06-12 18:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-06-15 17:35 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-06-17 18:09 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-06-18 1:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-06-19 15:05 ` Vivien Didelot
2015-06-19 15:05 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-06-19 15:48 ` Vivien Didelot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557B2181.9090900@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=cory.tusar@pid1solutions.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).