From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Fighting out-of-order reception with RPS? Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:49:00 +0200 Message-ID: <559D628C.5020100@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" , sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com, jonathon.reinhart@gmail.com To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, therbert.google.com@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org I'm picking up the request 'Setting RPS affinities from network driver' from Sunil Kovvuri http://marc.info/?t=142424023500001&r=1&w=2 as I assume to have the same issue here. When receiving CAN frames from a specific CAN network interface (e.g. can0) the frames are sporadically out-of-order on SMP systems like my Core i7 laptop with 4 CPUs. This out-of-order reception kills reliable communication e.g. for CAN transport protocols. First approach was to set the smp_affinity for the USB adapter on irq 28 with: echo 1 > /proc/irq/28/smp_affinity This worked in my case but it looks wrong to pin the USB host adapter to a single CPU and has to be done by hand depending on where the CAN interfaces are attached to the system. Next idea was to use RPS after reading Documentation/networking/scaling.txt As the only relevant flow identifiction is the number of the incoming CAN interface I added skb_set_hash(skb, dev->ifindex, PKT_HASH_TYPE_L2); when creating CAN skbs with alloc_can_skb() in drivers/net/can/dev.c After enabling RPS for my four CPUs with echo f > /sys/class/net/can0/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus I had no more out-of-order frames in my system :-) My two questions: 1. Is there any better solution to meet the described requirements? 2. If not: How can enable this RPS solution by default for CAN interfaces? Best regards, Oliver